Originally posted by: Laserman
But with Lucasfilm we are talking master tapes so players etc. don't come into the equation. Howcome something similar may not come into the equation here?Originally posted by: Laserman
As I said the fact that Moth3r's transfers look better in places than the GOUT even though via his (or any) transfer the PAL master tape has been effectively transferred to a laserdisc pressing master disc, then put to laserdisc, then put in a (relatively to the X0) crappy player, then captured on a consumer level cheap capture card, then recompressed to DVD and it *still* comes out better in places than the GOUT which hasn't been through those trials, that is proof that the PAL masters are better than the NTSC masters. Think about it for a minute or three.
You really think so? I don't think his has the edge in quality in most of the screencaps, over the OUT DVD that is... But with Lucasfilm we are talking master tapes so players etc. don't come into the equation. Howcome something similar may not come into the equation here?Originally posted by: Laserman
As I said the fact that Moth3r's transfers look better in places than the GOUT even though via his (or any) transfer the PAL master tape has been effectively transferred to a laserdisc pressing master disc, then put to laserdisc, then put in a (relatively to the X0) crappy player, then captured on a consumer level cheap capture card, then recompressed to DVD and it *still* comes out better in places than the GOUT which hasn't been through those trials, that is proof that the PAL masters are better than the NTSC masters. Think about it for a minute or three.