Originally posted by: boris
Notice 2 things... on the "a" is a "dark star" that goes over the text, and over the "e" a scratch appears in 1 frame. This would not be the case if it was a digital recreation.
Originally posted by: zombie84
Someone needs to do a layered composite of the two crawls to see if they sync up down to the pixel.
It's not necessary... the crawl is obviously an optical composite.. here, I'll show you...Someone needs to do a layered composite of the two crawls to see if they sync up down to the pixel.
Notice 2 things... on the "a" is a "dark star" that goes over the text, and over the "e" a scratch appears in 1 frame. This would not be the case if it was a digital recreation.
Boris, I said a lot of nasty things to you in the past (which many of them are still true IMHO).
But this is a really nice catch you made!
If you like, you can make another screenshot from the other fault I reported above. ^^^^^^^^^^^^
Honestly, I think most people were a little bit too fast here to dismiss the textcrawl as CGI generated. I was expecting this too, but to my surprise, IT REALLY SEEMS TO BE THE ORIGINAL. Problem is, these most probably false claims from us have started to spread around...