logo Sign In

Post #246291

Author
zombie84
Parent topic
What's Original '77 and What's Not?
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/246291/action/topic#246291
Date created
20-Sep-2006, 10:59 AM
Originally posted by: boris
Originally posted by: zombie84
Someone needs to do a layered composite of the two crawls to see if they sync up down to the pixel.
It's not necessary... the crawl is obviously an optical composite.. here, I'll show you...

http://img182.imageshack.us/img182/9091/crawlhf3.gif

Notice 2 things... on the "a" is a "dark star" that goes over the text, and over the "e" a scratch appears in 1 frame. This would not be the case if it was a digital recreation.



Wow, nice catch Boris! If you also look at the "N" there is another star that overlaps at the edge as well.

Well, that settles it for me. This looks like the real deal.

Now, i wonder--is the entire opening shot (ie crawl+stardestroyer) a new transfer as well? Because that original shot on the laserdisk had a different starfield did it not? Or is the new crawl simply blended with the old star destroyer shot? I ask this because if the whole thing is from a new transfer that may indicate that LFL has material ready for a pristine transfer of the OOT, and may even have already done such a scan.