logo Sign In

First Impressions of the OOT ... — Page 8

Author
Time
On the official site, a fan was asking about a burn mark on the exhaust port of the first Death Star.

He's suggesting that they added the burn mark from red leader's missed shot to the side of the port when they show Luke's hitting the mark in either the 97 or 2004 SE.

And he says that the burn mark is there on this latest release of the O-OT.

Can anyone here confirm wether or not that burn mark was there originally, or when it was introduced if it wasn't?
Your focus determines your reality.
Author
Time
Originally posted by: Gregatron
Well, I watched the "new" Star Wars DVD in its entirety yesterday.

There's an abrubt pause after Tarkin says, "Terminate her--immediately!". I believe that this was the disc-flipping/switching transition point for the laserdisc. For the DVD, the transtion (for what I presume is a DVD layer-switch now) has been pulled off rather clumsily.


Yes, that's the point of the layer change. There are some DVD players that imperceptibly switch layers- you may want to get one of those eventually. I'm definitely going to check one of those out for my next DVD player.

BTW- the layer change for ESB is the scene where Leia is looking out of the cockpit and sees the mynocks, and for ROTJ it's the point where Wicket enters the picture.

Author
Time
Originally posted by: JediRandy
Originally posted by: mverta
They are not conspiracies, JediRandy; they are lies and deceit exposed. I have personally seen the source files Lucasfilm claims don't exist to produce restored OT discs. The denial of their existence is a lie; as is the idea that financial and talent resources aren't available for a proper restoration. (I'm one of dozens of people who offered to donate state-of-the-art post-production services and facilites completely gratis to see it done.) The idea that the imagery in the 2004 DVD is superior is as laughable as any side-by-side comparison can demonstrate, only a few hundred of which are documented on my site. The revisionist nature of the entire history is well-documented, and disputed by no shortage of people involved in the creation of Star Wars.

None of us know exactly why this has always happened; probably never will. Probably financial, in some way that doesn't make sense to us, shy of some lynch-pin piece of data. But the evidence for a "conspiracy," if you want to be so X-Files about it, is overwhelming. In the end, there are just too many of us, with too much material and expertise, too many inside contacts, and too many privileged sources to make the idea of a deliberately substandard release anything less than fact. In fact, even Lucasfilm is aware the images are substandard: they're deliberately posting compares on the StarWars.com site to show you how shitty the OT DVD's you just bought are.

Frankly, I don't care why Lucasfilm takes the position they do; I already have my own Star Wars vastly superior to anything they've put out. But in the interest of preservation, accuracy, and love for the trilogy, I'm not going to turn a blind eye to the deficiencies which are patently obvious in these transfers. I'm not going to pretend it's okay for Luke's lightsaber in ANH to be green, or Obi Wan's to be purple, or all the glows eaten off the laserbolts. I'm not going to pretend it's okay that the audio in the surrounds are fipped left-to-right. I'm not going to pretend it's okay that the 2006 DVD is grainier than a pre-93 laserdisc transfer I've had sitting on my hard drive for years. I'm not going to believe the source files for a proper restoration don't exist when I've seen them with my own eyes.

If you honestly can't conceive of any of the myriad reasons - financial, artistic, or personal - for why all of this has gone down, then I don't know what to tell you. It isn't particularly hard, nor uncommon a set of potential motivations. As far as conspiracy theories go, it's about as boring as it gets.

_Mike

If only the "Twilight Zone" theme was playing as I read that.



JediRandy, your hilarious. Name-calling and slander only expose you for the idiot you truly are. He who rests his position on bile, has no position at all.

Originally posted by: mverta
The opening crawl is bullshit - spotted the fake gate-weave right away. What's even worse is that if you have any ability at all, you can do a completely convincing, organic looking gate weave; I've had to do that a bunch for other projects. It just screams digital post gag.

Also, I'm willing to put some serious money on the fact that grain has been added to ANH, at least. Again, maybe it's from 12 years of doing this stuff every day, but there's a look to post-added grain that I noticed in a bunch of scenes.

There are two truths: 1) The materials exist to make a fully restored OT DVD, scanned already. 2) Lucas does not want the OT to supplant the SE. The images are being deliberately served up to look worse, from the unnecessary sourcing of laserdisc masters when better materials exist, to the non-anamorphic transfer, etc. They're even running a "campaign" on StarWars.com showcasing the differences between the 1977 and 2004 versions of the films, so that fans can see just how much better the 2004's are. It's a curious move to deliberately devalue a product you just released, isn't it?

_Mike


This is precisely what my gut tells me. This release is primarily meant to:

A) Clear out a backlog of 04 DVDs and increase revenue in an off year.
B) Stop or reduce criticism for "not releasing the originals."

and most important

C) To convince the "average consumer" that Lucas' changes and new versions are better than the Originals. To drum up support for continued changes and new releases.

These are the only sets of motivations that will correctly line up with their actions. Why else would they call these bonus disks? Aside from jacking up the price, why also include the 04 DVDs? Why release them non-anamorphic? Why launch a web site campaign which compares the two and highlights the differences?

Lucas is dead set on convincing consumers his new visions are the best. He needs to silence his critics ahead of his big 2007 release - and of course, make money in the process. What better way than to let "the average consumer" compare, although unfairly, the two versions? At least, in his mind. Though, I feel this will backfire - as even a low-quality O-OT is superior to the digitized technical DVD disaster.

In my mind though, this release will actually make the case for preservation to the original public. And hopefully, educated fans of the O-OT can counteract the "misinformation" campaign.
Fuck the Jedi Council.
Author
Time
Originally posted by: Go-Mer-Tonic
On the official site, a fan was asking about a burn mark on the exhaust port of the first Death Star.

He's suggesting that they added the burn mark from red leader's missed shot to the side of the port when they show Luke's hitting the mark in either the 97 or 2004 SE.

And he says that the burn mark is there on this latest release of the O-OT.

Can anyone here confirm wether or not that burn mark was there originally, or when it was introduced if it wasn't?



I'm just going on memory here, but I'm pretty sure that's always been there.

You know of the rebellion against the Empire?

Author
Time
Originally posted by: Go-Mer-Tonic
On the official site, a fan was asking about a burn mark on the exhaust port of the first Death Star.

He's suggesting that they added the burn mark from red leader's missed shot to the side of the port when they show Luke's hitting the mark in either the 97 or 2004 SE.

And he says that the burn mark is there on this latest release of the O-OT.

Can anyone here confirm wether or not that burn mark was there originally, or when it was introduced if it wasn't?



It was always there.

Author
Time
Okay, that's what I figured. I knew you guys would be the ones to ask.
Your focus determines your reality.
Author
Time
I just watched ESB, and it looked great too. Some of the stuff on Hoth looked bad, and a few of the space battles got a little hazy, but it looked good.
Watch DarthEvil's Who Framed Darth Vader? video on YouTube!

You can also access the entire Horriffic Violence Theater Series from my Channel Page.
Author
Time
Originally posted by: WaragainsttheCouncil
Lucas is dead set on convincing consumers his new visions are the best. He needs to silence his critics ahead of his big 2007 release - and of course, make money in the process. What better way than to let "the average consumer" compare, although unfairly, the two versions? At least, in his mind. Though, I feel this will backfire - as even a low-quality O-OT is superior to the digitized technical DVD disaster.


No, what he needs to do if he really wants to make "his complete vision" is redo the whole damn thing. Throw the PT and the OT in the trash and start over from scratch. Write a complete story that doesn't have to match anything that already exists. He's got the money, tools, and technology. He can go out and hire some new actors and completely redo the whole thing the way he wants to do it now. Then we can see how well it really sells.

Everything for the past 20 years has been riding on the success of the OT. I'd love to see how "his vision" really sells when he doesn't have to worry about writing to an existing story. He could even call it Star Wars if he wants to, he owns all the copyrights. Of course, that would negate his plans to "move on" to other things, but so does a Star Wars TV show, IMO.

F Scale score - 3.3333333333333335

You are disciplined but tolerant; a true American.

Pissing off Rob since August 2007.
Author
Time
Originally posted by: mverta

We certainly could, that's for sure. Personally, I believe that would only happen post-George's death. I began work on the Legacy Edition only after people who would know, suggested as much. Basically, there are people I trust - you would, too - who told me "forget it" and told me why. And I was thoroughly convinced.
So going by what you've said earlier in this thread, this is an opinion you have formed based on information and knowledge you have access to through actually working for Lucasfilm, that is access to resources which are under confidential agreements? If that is correct, then please accept this token of appreciation for your posts from someone who as much as possible tries to stay within the boundaries of rational and truthful reason.

As for myself, since I don't have any of this direct knowledge, I can only make educated guesses based on what Lucasfilm does, and deduce their intentions by comparing those actions to similar actions made by other people and corporate entities for which the intentions are at least partially or fully known to me. Since that sort of extrapolative analysis tends to branch off into chaos and pure speculation rather quickly, I admit that I haven't spent too much time on it, but my guess about Lucas' intentions, going by what I see, can be summed up as follows:

Lucas(film) quite clearly wants to earn as much money as possible off the Star Wars franchise (for himself, for his family and for whatever other personal reasons), and the best way to do that is obviously to keep the franchise going. However, releasing exactly the products the market wants immediately would be to cut off a viable revenue stream prematurely, so rather than throwing away profit, they instead exploit the marketing opportunities of giving people almost, but not quite, what they want. This is accomplished through an iterative product cycle, the properties for which is determined mostly by financial and marketing fundamentals. The product cycle consists of releasing various incarnations of the same product in sequence until the market for the basic item is saturated. When the lifespan of one (or perhaps a group of) such product in the franchise is nearing the end, some of the gained profit is reinvested in order to come up with a new product to start the cycle going over again and thus keep the franchise going. In the case of Star Wars, this is likely the investing and marketing model which will yield the maximum amount of profit from it over a human lifetime. This is also an excellent way of catching the focus of the media and generating some buzz from time to time as Lucas himself sees fit, so as to cater to one of his most important secondary interests, namely to portray himself as a visionary artist and filmmaker.

Oh, and mverta, if the above is reduced to no more than mindless speculation when held up against the truth as you know it, have no hesitations about telling me. Actually, I'd be quite interested to know! On the other hand, if you instead remain silent I might just think I'm onto something. (Just kidding.)

And don't think I'm not tempted every day to put Legacy out, which with a couple of good torrent seeds, would put right a shitload of wrongs. You would also see a legal smackdown ensue of galactic proportions. But regardless, I just can't bring myself to do it. Just not how I roll.

I understand quite well where you're coming from, and I second your notion on not to do it. Personally, I will be infinitely grateful if you only continue your work on posting information and screenshots on your website! I find your thoughts and take on the films and your work on them very interesting in and of itself. Besides, it might just happen that, one day, one of Lucas many movie releases comes just close enough to what I want for me to actually bother to take on the task of editing, or should I say restoring it into the science fantasy adventure fairy tale I'd like and love to see once again.
Author
Time
lord3vil, that would be a very accurate analysis of the current situation. Add "ego", and the everything falls into place. Motivation matches action. Very nice post.
Fuck the Jedi Council.
Author
Time
Originally posted by: Raul2106
Think about how each new release gives everybody new things to talk about. Really it is quite an exciting time to be a Star Wars fan. I love all of Star Wars that is why I do not like to see people who don't hate the 2004 editions being attacked. Originaltrilogy.com is a site that is devoted to film preservation. It's a beautiful thing. DVDActive, particularly their site administrator gave the OOT a favorable review yet bashed everybody who said there was nothing wrong with the release being non-anamorphic. I stuck up for another person who was simply pointing out that no matter what people are always going to be unhappy with Lucas. I perfer the OOT but enjoy the 2004 editions too. Now we can at least legally choose which version we want to watch. It's great having both.



Actually, I was only involved in an argument with one person, and it wasn't about him saying there was 'nothing wrong with them being anamorphic'. If you're going to come onto this forum and start bad-mouthing me, at least get the facts straight. His argument was that restoring the films and/or giving them 16:9 enhancement is tantamount to altering them, which it clearly isn't. This is what he actually said:

"...you know, there is no bigger SW fan than I am (I have a complete room dedicated to my Star Wars toys, er, memorabilia) but nothing drives me insane more than the internet fanboy that is never pleased. First you whine and complain that you want the original unaltered versions on DVD, and when you get them you complain and complain some more because they are not to your exact specifications...if I were Lucas I'd be resentful towards some of the fans as well because he can never seem to win. "Give us the unaltered, original films!" you cry, but then when they come out: "We want it remastered! We want it anamorphic! We want 5.1 digital mix!" Look, you wanted a 70's quality product in terms of technology and that's what you're getting...hell you could even argue you're getting even more seeing as they're the 1993 LD editions.

Look, it all boils down to this: STOP FREAKING COMPLAINING!"

It was quite a hostile thing to post, and I took exception to being labelled an 'Internet fanboy' along with everyone else who wants quality versions of the film on DVD (although the irony of it coming from a grown man with a room full of Star Wars toys was not lost on me). If I remember correctly, you then joined and posted that rather rude reply (referring to me as GOULD after I'd expressly requested that people not do it, as I find it disrespectful). It was for that reason that the webmaster banned you, quite independently of me I might add as I hadn't seen the post at the time. I'm told you then tried to join again, this time creating a user name that was designed to insult me, so you were banned for a second time. We then got a load of abusive post reports accusing us of being Nazis, all from the same IP address. Extremely mature.

So please, if you're going to misrepresent me, do it on a site that I don't frequent and/or contribute to.

Oh, and having just found this thread, I'm a lot clearer as to why you felt compelled to back up his flawed argument.
"Whatever! I digitally put Jabba the Hutt back into the original Star Wars movie! I'll do what I want!"
Author
Time
Originally posted by: mverta
And don't think I'm not tempted every day to put Legacy out, which with a couple of good torrent seeds, would put right a shitload of wrongs. You would also see a legal smackdown ensue of galactic proportions. But regardless, I just can't bring myself to do it. Just not how I roll.

_Mike


But could you be tempted to use a patching utility to put out binary blobs we could use to "fix" the defective official DVDs? Or would that be tantamount to releasing the whole thing?
"It's the stoned movie you don't have to be stoned for." -- Tom Shales on Star Wars
Scruffy's gonna die the way he lived.
Author
Time
Originally posted by: Scruffy
But could you be tempted to use a patching utility to put out binary blobs we could use to "fix" the defective official DVDs? Or would that be tantamount to releasing the whole thing?


...sounds like a semantics thing, there, Scruffy, since I've had to make numerous adjustments to every single frame of Star Wars, so any "fixes" would actually be the entire film, anyway.

_Mike

View the Restoration and join the discussion at StarWarsLegacy.com!

Author
Time
I figured as much ... but I thought a sufficiently fine-grained patching utility could pull out the changed data between the MPEG frame headers, leaving you with an unwatchable 4GiB binary blob that can be patched into the official DVDs. Still, it's your butt the LucasLawyers would go after, so I cannot fault your decision.
"It's the stoned movie you don't have to be stoned for." -- Tom Shales on Star Wars
Scruffy's gonna die the way he lived.
Author
Time
Originally posted by: mverta
Originally posted by: Mike O: Do you think that we'll ever see a proper release?


We certainly could, that's for sure. Personally, I believe that would only happen post-George's death. I began work on the Legacy Edition only after people who would know, suggested as much. Basically, there are people I trust - you would, too - who told me "forget it" and told me why. And I was thoroughly convinced. And don't think I'm not tempted every day to put Legacy out, which with a couple of good torrent seeds, would put right a shitload of wrongs. You would also see a legal smackdown ensue of galactic proportions. But regardless, I just can't bring myself to do it. Just not how I roll.

_Mike


So then basically, we are shafted?

“What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one.”

Neil Postman, Amusing Ourselves to Death

Author
Time
Basically. But if you'll notice, the term "we" is changing to represent a smaller and smaller group of people. There's lots of people convincing themselves - or no longer needing a lot of convincing - that the quality of this last release isn't subpar, or if it is, they're happy with it. Lucasfilm is playing the long game; a waiting game; and it's working. After all this time, and all the petitions, and a billion posts and letters, and calls, and articles, and reviews and interviews, they put out a release that's worse than most B-Movies, and blatantly lie about why. ...just wearing us down.

And again, when I say, "us" I mean, me, you, and the core group of people who truly have a passion for historical preservation, who came to this site long before it morphed into freakin' TFN junior.

_Mike

View the Restoration and join the discussion at StarWarsLegacy.com!

Author
Time
Originally posted by: mverta
Basically. But if you'll notice, the term "we" is changing to represent a smaller and smaller group of people. There's lots of people convincing themselves - or no longer needing a lot of convincing - that the quality of this last release isn't subpar, or if it is, they're happy with it. Lucasfilm is playing the long game; a waiting game; and it's working. After all this time, and all the petitions, and a billion posts and letters, and calls, and articles, and reviews and interviews, they put out a release that's worse than most B-Movies, and blatantly lie about why. ...just wearing us down.

And again, when I say, "us" I mean, me, you, and the core group of people who truly have a passion for historical preservation, who came to this site long before it morphed into freakin' TFN junior.

_Mike

Mike, I honor and respect your opinion of course. But a business is a business, and it only understands one thing: MONEY! This release will prove that there is lots more to be made and LFL/Fox/God knows who else is involved will definitely take notice. Not only did they bring old fans back w/ this release, but they turned a whole group of people who never saw them before on to it. I feel that they'll want it in future releases to, if nothing else than for collection's sake...
Author
Time
Originally posted by: mverta
Lucasfilm is playing the long game; a waiting game; and it's working.

I wonder what makes you put it this way, because I honestly can't see any such sophistication about what they're doing myself. Lucasfilm is just a company trying to maximize profit and their actions fit perfectly with that simple scheme. They don't have a lot of movie products to sell, only a scarce few films, and if they were to release pristine versions so good as to be perfect for historical preservation, they'd lose a big chunk of their business right there. As far as the man in charge is concerned, it's money first and a little glory second, and history shows that to get more of the former, he's more than willing to sacrifice the latter.
Author
Time
Just watched ROTJ and it looked great! Perfect to how I want it to look.

One of the biggest improvments over the laserdiscs is that the bars on the widescreen are truly black. They're much less distracting, and I love that.

So my final verdict---Anamorphic Shmamamorphic. I'm perfectly happy with these.
Watch DarthEvil's Who Framed Darth Vader? video on YouTube!

You can also access the entire Horriffic Violence Theater Series from my Channel Page.
Author
Time
Lucasfilm is run by incompotent idiots and if they can succeed at anything it would only be the death of the Star Wars, money-making franchise. I don't fear anything they do.

"Now all Lucas has to do is make a cgi version of himself.  It will be better than the original and fit his original vision." - skyjedi2005

Author
Time
Why didn't Lucas play the same 'trick' with the Indiana Jones franchise then? i.e. release a sub-par edition to keep the revenue rolling in until they released another 'improved' edition? Was there ever going to be an Indiana Jones special edition or did Spielberg talk him out of it?

I don't see what he stands to lose by releasing a proper fresh anamorphic of the original versions of the trilogy - afterall Blu-Ray and HD-DVD are where it's at now, so he could have the SE's released on this new super-duper format, and leave the originals for ST-DVD. That we just about get what we want, and he gets to maintain the 'superiority' of his new versions on the new formats.

- John
Author
Time
Indy doesn't have multiple versions of it to milk. And technically the DVD is a an SE of sorts since its had some rotoscoping and fixing done to it, but the results are so subtle that there really wouldnt be a market for an "original theatrical edition" release. Lucasfilm I don't think owns the Indy franchise the way they do SW either, i think Paramount has the ultimate say, or am i wrong about this?
Author
Time
mverta, this site is NOT a mini-TFn. I respectfully disagree. Even if a few of those types make their way here. Even more will - out of boredom - as TF.n has long since policed away everyone interesting. But it is still not that.

And I really don't think this "release" is going to help Lucasfilm - the way they believe it will and the way you believe it will. This release only highlights the need for preservation and a proper restoration. It doesn't - as they hope - bury the case. They have even less of a ground to stand on than they did before.

Originally posted by: lord3vil
Originally posted by: mverta
Lucasfilm is playing the long game; a waiting game; and it's working.

I wonder what makes you put it this way, because I honestly can't see any such sophistication about what they're doing myself. Lucasfilm is just a company trying to maximize profit and their actions fit perfectly with that simple scheme. They don't have a lot of movie products to sell, only a scarce few films, and if they were to release pristine versions so good as to be perfect for historical preservation, they'd lose a big chunk of their business right there. As far as the man in charge is concerned, it's money first and a little glory second, and history shows that to get more of the former, he's more than willing to sacrifice the latter.


Here's where I disagree. This is one business model. Not the only one. Not even necessarily the best business model. It is purely one approach out of many.

LFL does have many other revenue generators. THX, LucasArts, LFL (who worked on the most successful film of the year, PIRATES) and then the merchandising wings including EU. There is a plethora of revenue streams into that company. So LFL isn't dependent upon releasing and re-releasing and re-releasing SW again and again to survive.

Two, this a business model approach based on quantity. Sadly though, if they spent some time in LFL (in all their divisions) focusing on QUALITY, then the quantity numbers would probably far exceed the extra costs. The market continuously rewards quailty, and punishes substandard products. Even if a substandard release brings in a nice revenue stream, a well-quanitified forecast of a "quality" release of the same product will still usually outperform the substandard release - even with different cost structures.

Enough with the fancy words though, it's Monday. Crap sells. Quality sells. But which one lasts in the marketplace and which one, almost always, sells more. Quality. Which one is ultimately remembered? Quality. Eventually, and this is proved in the market time and time again, crap is punished in the marketplace. Crap loses. George found this out with his ATTACK OF THE CLONES release. For a SW franchise title, it performed miserably.

Yes, LFL has a business model - and it's one built on milking this franchise and using a "i'll take anything" fanbase to do so. It is a valid business model which will yield profits. But it isn't the ONLY business model, and not even necessarily the most profitable one.
Fuck the Jedi Council.
Author
Time
I did some more investigation into the sound mixes. Here's what I came up with.


The Star Wars (theatrical version) "bonus disc" features the 1993 Definitive Collection sound mix as the basis for the English audio track. The only difference between the DVD and the DC laserdisc is the original opening crawl being slapped onto the beginning of the movie (which also allows the musical "crash" to be properly in sync with the reveal of Tatooine, as it was originally, before the "ANH" subtitle was added in 1981).

The disc's optional Spanish and French language tracks (which were probably dug out of the Lucasfilm Archives for this Limited Edition release), however, are based on the rarely-heard MONO sound mix from 1977!!!!

How do I know?


*Threepio says the famous tractor beam lines (in French/Spanish), lines that do not appear in the Defintive Collection mix.

*Luke (albeit speaking in French/Spanish) says, "Blast it, Wedge, where are you?" (as he does in the mono mix), as opposed to, "Blast it, Biggs, where are you?" as he does in all other versions of the movie.

* The Falcon's chessboard creatures make some different sounds than all other versions of the movie.

* The additional Falcon cockpit sounds (and the whizzing asteroid sounds heard as the ship comes out of hyperspace) that were originally exclusive to the mono mix (and were added back in for the 1997 SE) can be heard on the Spanish and French tracks.


On the 2004 SE DVD, the Spanish audio track is completely new, and uses the 2004 SE mix as its basis.

However, the French audio track is the same one that appears on the "bonus disc" (This version is still based on the original mono mix, with the same French-speaking voice actors as can be heard on the "bonus disc". In this version, French-speaking Luke still says, "Blast it, Wedge, where are you?", while on the new Spanish track, he says, "Blast it, Biggs, where are you?", as in the 2004 SE.), but with the SE material spliced in at the appropriate spots!!!! It seems they even used different voice actors for the added scenes and dialogue (such as Han's voice in the restored Jabba scene)!

But, aside from the SE additions, the original sounds for the Vader/Kenobi duel can still be heard on the French track, as well as the alternate Falcon chessboard creature sounds from the mono mix!


For Empire, the English audio track on the bonus disc is the same as the Definitive Collection sound mix. However, the French and Spanish audio tracks feature a different sound mix than the 1993 Definitive Collection, a mix which appears to be based on the original 70 mm sound mix from the film's initial theatrical release!

This alternate mix features some additional sounds that were not heard on the 35mm and subsequent home video versions, but which were later reincorporated into the 1997 and 2004 mixes. Such sounds include additional R2-D2 beeps when Yoda rummages through Luke's supplies, and additional TIE fighter engine sounds in the establishing shot of Darth Vader's Star Destroyer (after Luke beheads the illusory Vader on Dagobah).


On the 2004 Empire DVD, the Spanish audio track is completely new (as with ANh and ROTJ), and uses the 2004 SE mix as its basis.

However, the French audio track is the same one that appears on the "bonus disc" (based on the original 70 mm mix, with the same French-speaking voice actors), but with the SE material spliced in at the appropriate spots. For example, Luke does not say, "Thanks, Threepio." in the Hoth medical center in the French version (but he does in the new Spanish track).


Finally, for the Jedi 2004 SE, the Spanish audio track is completely new (As with ANH and ESB), and uses the 2004 SE mix as its basis. However, the French audio track is the same as the one on the "bonus disc", albeit with new SE material spliced in.
Author
Time
Originally posted by: seventiesfilmnut
Why didn't Lucas play the same 'trick' with the Indiana Jones franchise then? i.e. release a sub-par edition to keep the revenue rolling in until they released another 'improved' edition? Was there ever going to be an Indiana Jones special edition or did Spielberg talk him out of it?
- John


Lucas WANTED to do one, but I don't think Spielberg did. PLUS, a few months before the Indy DVD release, South Park had an episode where the town revolted against a fictional Lucas and Spielberg going back and revamping Raiders of the Lost Ark. This probably made Lucas and Spielberg realize if they changed the films they'd be playing all the fans expectations and become laughing stocks. Lucas probably didn't care, his reputation is shot, but I'm betting Spielberg wouldn't risk his rep. over a pointless revamp of his films.

And I've got to say, I love that Indiana Jones set. Lacking in the bonus features department, but at least the films are there, in tact, with really good remastering, and ANAMORPHIC!!!

Nothing will match the Back to the Future boxset though...
Watch DarthEvil's Who Framed Darth Vader? video on YouTube!

You can also access the entire Horriffic Violence Theater Series from my Channel Page.