Originally posted by: Karyudo
The multiple stormtrooper eyes, which I believe was the original subject of this thread.
Originally posted by: Zion
It's there, you just have to use slo-mo if you can't catch it in regular motion. As someone who's gone through the whole film shot by shot and frame by frame, I can tell you that there are hundreds of shots that have the same problems. They all stem from the 1993 THX DVNR process that cleaned up the dirt. Interesting side effect, isn't it?
Originally posted by: Mielr
I've watched the new SW DVD (NTSC) and I didn't see any evidence of that.
Evidence of what?
I've watched the new SW DVD (NTSC) and I didn't see any evidence of that.
Evidence of what?
The multiple stormtrooper eyes, which I believe was the original subject of this thread.
Originally posted by: Zion
It's there, you just have to use slo-mo if you can't catch it in regular motion. As someone who's gone through the whole film shot by shot and frame by frame, I can tell you that there are hundreds of shots that have the same problems. They all stem from the 1993 THX DVNR process that cleaned up the dirt. Interesting side effect, isn't it?
I didn't watch the movie in slo-mo, I didn't watch it frame-by-frame, I just watched it, and enjoyed it. I think you'll find that there are a lot of flaws you'll thankfully miss that way. Personally, I think that whatever flaws that are evident are less objectionable than the flaws in the 2004 DVDs (Greedo shooting first comes to mind....)