Originally posted by: Zion
A new transfer would have gotten rid of a much bigger problem, the nasty ghosting that plagues this release from start to finish:
(Above is a cap from the LD, but the GOUT looks exactly the same with a slight edge in "detail".)
Does it? You know if that cap was off the OUT then you would have had a point. As it is, here is a real cap of that frame from the OUT - captured with VirtualDubMod, unretouched, just resized:Originally posted by: boris
Whenever people here still complain about the quality of the 1993 masters, saying that they should have re-scanned the film from scratch I just think of that one frame – and I think what little difference it would have really made.
Whenever people here still complain about the quality of the 1993 masters, saying that they should have re-scanned the film from scratch I just think of that one frame – and I think what little difference it would have really made.
A new transfer would have gotten rid of a much bigger problem, the nasty ghosting that plagues this release from start to finish:
(Above is a cap from the LD, but the GOUT looks exactly the same with a slight edge in "detail".)
Where did the ghosting go? Oh sure, it's still there.. but it's not much any more. Not to mention that it has a little more then just a "slight edge" in detail over the laserdisc, wouldn't you agree?