Originally posted by: bactaOT
*looks*
Hmm, yes you are correct. Yet I'm pretty sure I didn't see the "Moth3r" screenshots this morning. Maybe I skipped right by them somehow, but they look good so I don't know how I managed to do that page after page.
Originally posted by: boris
Generally, the 2004 transfer is sharper, and generally has more stable colours... however they're the wrong hues and the saturation is also way off. So yes, overall the GOUT is more "pleasing" to me anyway.
Originally posted by: Tiptup
Are you looking at the correct images?
The Moth3r is much better than the Gonzo.
Originally posted by: Zion
Screenshots are up on the Screenshot Comparison Page
After that, the "Gonzo" set most often looked the best to me.
Screenshots are up on the Screenshot Comparison Page
After that, the "Gonzo" set most often looked the best to me.
Are you looking at the correct images?
The Moth3r is much better than the Gonzo.
*looks*
Hmm, yes you are correct. Yet I'm pretty sure I didn't see the "Moth3r" screenshots this morning. Maybe I skipped right by them somehow, but they look good so I don't know how I managed to do that page after page.
Originally posted by: boris
Generally, the 2004 transfer is sharper, and generally has more stable colours... however they're the wrong hues and the saturation is also way off. So yes, overall the GOUT is more "pleasing" to me anyway.
That's what I mean. The "GOUT" looks the most accurate to me. It just looks like Star Wars. The 2004 editions look all wrong in that basic sense (as if the film were deteriorating and nothing looks real anymore).