Originally posted by: calamari
Then there is something wrong. NTSC=NTSC.
Honestly, why all the Boris bashing? It's almost like you guys are taking your anti-Lucas frustrations out on him. You were definitely not trying to understand his post... you just wanted to flame.
Originally posted by: boris
That´s not what he said. You just happened to have interpreted it the same way as he did in his follow-up post to my response.
I can see those black lines especially when watching laserdiscs. DVD's aren't so bad.
Originally posted by: Vigo
LOL! boris, you are truly an unicum here!
The first time I heard that NTSC has actually MORE visible scanlines than PAL.... What I mean is the BLACK scanlines, between the lines of picture, will be thicker - and more visible. This is what bothers some people. I thought I what I said was clear the first time?
It made sense to me. He was not saying that NTSC had beteer resolution. He was saying it looked worse, because of the lower resolution you can see blank lines between the real lines.
LOL! boris, you are truly an unicum here!

It made sense to me. He was not saying that NTSC had beteer resolution. He was saying it looked worse, because of the lower resolution you can see blank lines between the real lines.
That´s not what he said. You just happened to have interpreted it the same way as he did in his follow-up post to my response.

I can see those black lines especially when watching laserdiscs. DVD's aren't so bad.
Then there is something wrong. NTSC=NTSC.
Honestly, why all the Boris bashing? It's almost like you guys are taking your anti-Lucas frustrations out on him. You were definitely not trying to understand his post... you just wanted to flame.
No offence, but did YOU actually READ AND UNDERSTAND what boris has written here over the past few months? His numerous false claims, and always repeating them over and over, despite being corrected many times by people who actually WORK IN THE INDUSTRY
