Originally posted by: borisI'd be willing to bet my right nut that it's been corrected.
* kkkkrrrrrrg, plop! *
By the way, Moth3r, I do know what I'm saying... just like I knew what I was saying when I told you not to go comparing the colour of our captures when they weren't captured using the same method - and you know something? I was right. Mind you I didn't flame at you or call what you said a "load of techno-bullshit" that you don't really understand.
* kkkkrrrrrrg, plop! *
By the way, Moth3r, I do know what I'm saying... just like I knew what I was saying when I told you not to go comparing the colour of our captures when they weren't captured using the same method - and you know something? I was right. Mind you I didn't flame at you or call what you said a "load of techno-bullshit" that you don't really understand.
boris, let´s face it:
we don´t want to talk about how much you have been corrected here on this forum, do we? We don´t want to talk about how often you obviously are juggling with technological catchphrases without actually knowing what´s all behind this, do we? Give Moth3r your best shot now, will you?
Perhaps we should open a "best of boris" thread, since it has become very boring to go through all your posts and search for your best remarks. My favourites are still:
"digital film scratches"
"better PAL colour pallet"
"more visible scanlines in NTSC"
"16mm is DVD, 35mm is HDTV"
"DV material looks very good in cinemas!"
and more most amusing remarks you have made here during your membership. Shall we continue?