Originally posted by: Zion
Watch the crawl again. Notice how the stars wobble and the words don't. I would say that's more than a valid reason to suspect the GOUT has a recreated crawl. At the very most that is evidence of it being re-composited, or has been digitally stabilized. By the way, the stars would not wobble if it was recreated... when they generate the crawl (and you can confirm this over at Star Wars dot Com) all they do is use a still frame, and CGI the words over it... the stars don't wobble - watch the ROTS crawl - and if the stars wobble and the words don't then I'll eat my hat.What proof do you need that uncompressed audio is better than 192Kbps compressed audio? It's a fact.
Zion, I thought you of all people would know that it's not the bitrate that counts, it's the content. It would be an illegal DVD format without the DD track anyway, and you have to judge it based on how it *sounds*, not based solely on the technical specifications. That's why my non-anamorphic NTSC robocop looks better then my Anamorphic PAL one (I've provided some screen caps that demonstrate that as well).Watch the crawl again. Notice how the stars wobble and the words don't. I would say that's more than a valid reason to suspect the GOUT has a recreated crawl. At the very most that is evidence of it being re-composited, or has been digitally stabilized. By the way, the stars would not wobble if it was recreated... when they generate the crawl (and you can confirm this over at Star Wars dot Com) all they do is use a still frame, and CGI the words over it... the stars don't wobble - watch the ROTS crawl - and if the stars wobble and the words don't then I'll eat my hat.What proof do you need that uncompressed audio is better than 192Kbps compressed audio? It's a fact.
I know what you're going to say "Boris, it's the SAME track as the uncompressed LD one"... maybe, but that doesn't mean there aren't flaws on the LD track that were ironed out for the DVD.