The indefinite article of course indicating openness to the possibility of being wrong (i am just going from memory), as well as my proposal that it may be due to less-than-optimal exposure on the EOD telecine.

This still doesn't answer the question though: why is it different than the EOD crawl? Clearly the EOD crawl is newly struck from a film source, however the OOT crawl is very different, in terms of image quality, image characteristics and colouring. Why was the EOD crawl not used, and does this indicate that the OOT crawl may indeed still be a re-created one, albeit a perfectly-re-created one?