This is not too different from a filter I proposed and had coded about two years ago, called 'TooT'. In fact, I don't think PhotoAcute could do any better, since the three captures are not "continuous photos", but instead three nearly-identical copies of exactly the same master. In other words, all the scan lines are fixed; there is none of the small variation in capturing small details that can be exploited to increase detail. Like PhotoAcute promises, TooT will reduce noise and eliminate dropouts, but it can't possibly increase real resolution (just as PhotoAcute can't).

I thought I'd read a post or e-mail by Zion where he mentioned TooT, so I'm confident the X0 Project is well on top of image post-processing.