logo Sign In

Post #238869

Author
Vigo
Parent topic
So, this is how the DVDs are going to look...
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/238869/action/topic#238869
Date created
27-Aug-2006, 6:46 AM
And here goes the further defending FOR low quality:


Originally posted by: boris

LinkLoucst demanded the highest level of grain removal. It does not truly represent the original negative.

If you look careful, you can still spot the film grain in the transfers. Since you are the person, who claimed in the past that a DVD can truly represent the full resolution of a 35mm frame (LOL), I highly doubt that you are the one who actually can spot hard film grain removal and its symptoms in digital restaurations.

So, you think that an old non-anamorphic soft and washed-out transfer made in 1993 with obsolete equipment represent the originals better than an all-new transfer directly made from the negatives, right?


And as for your other comment, I wish you would stop calling them "LD transfers" - because it just shows that either you don't know what you're talking about, or you're biased to the point of over-exaggerations and false claims.


They are LD transfers, made from the LD mastertapes, and the screenshots already show clearly all the flaws. They lack detail, and contrast and won´t, in general, look better than the fan preservations. Repeat: they won´t look better than the fan preservations.

Now, go ahead, and think of something new, how to defend this procedure coming from a multi billion dollar company.

Sorry, this is just plain ridiculous. "Fans" fighting for low Star Wars quality, *LOL*