Originally posted by: boris
I don't believe it was a real review.
1. It was inaccessible at the posted url.
It is accessible. Click the very bottom link, then navigate back to the previous page to clear the ad that originally appeared (mine was for "Arrested Development Season 2").
2. You cannot prevent reviewers from making screenshots - that is protected under the news and documentaries clauses (which are embedded into the basic copyright laws that all countries respecting copyrights observe).
I don't believe it was a real review.
1. It was inaccessible at the posted url.
It is accessible. Click the very bottom link, then navigate back to the previous page to clear the ad that originally appeared (mine was for "Arrested Development Season 2").
2. You cannot prevent reviewers from making screenshots - that is protected under the news and documentaries clauses (which are embedded into the basic copyright laws that all countries respecting copyrights observe).
Are you sure about France. If they mad an agreement with Lucas for the privilege of previewing the DVDs, why couldn't that be a contractual stipulation. The DVDs haven't been officially released, right? So, it's not like the French website could have goten their hands on copies without Lucas' help, right?