logo Sign In

A Question to the Older Members — Page 2

Author
Time
The telecine certainly brought out the garbage mattes tremendously compared to projected theatrical prints, where you can hardly see them. This is why arguing for garbage mattes to be untouched doesn't really make sense. You'd get a better representation of the original theatrical experience on home video if those shots were digitally recomposited (as some were for the SE). Keeping them is more like preserving the early video versions than the movie itself.
Author
Time
Me too, but I'd never seen garbage mattes until the '04 release.

There is no lingerie in space…

C3PX said: Gaffer is like that hot girl in high school that you think you have a chance with even though she is way out of your league because she is sweet and not a stuck up bitch who pretends you don’t exist… then one day you spot her making out with some skinny twerp, only on second glance you realize it is the goth girl who always sits in the back of class; at that moment it dawns on you why she is never seen hanging off the arm of any of the jocks… and you realize, damn, she really is unobtainable after all. Not that that is going to stop you from dreaming… Only in this case, Gaffer is actually a guy.

Author
Time
I'm never bothered by bad special effects if the movie's story is good. However, modern day movies are all about special effects and rarely anything else. If I'm going to pay nine dollars to see a film that cost hundreds of millions of dolars to make, the special effects better be damn good. I'll criticize the hell out of them if they aren't.



"Now all Lucas has to do is make a cgi version of himself.  It will be better than the original and fit his original vision." - skyjedi2005