Originally posted by: Karyudo
I guess I have to quote you again:

Most of [the cleanup needed] is due to anomalies created by Laserdisc and not the master.
Actually, the film was cleaned up frame-for frame, and is far more extensive then the amount of clean-up that's being done by X0
[E]ven if they don't do more correction, the fact is the amount of colour correction and film cleanup they did in 1993 is way more then the X0 project is [doing].

Now, can you explain how that isn't ripping on the X0 Project?

Certainly, I was simply putting Marvolo's points into context, and if you look back he's actually edited his points now. All I wanted to show was that the points he made were biased.Originally posted by: Karyudo
I reiterate: no matter how much you pretend to be rational and objective, you are not, as long as you continue to present "facts" such as the ones quoted above.

Anything there isn't clear evidence for is clearly identified as being speculation and not fact.

"- George is not doing for the OUT what he did for his revised versions (i.e. colour correction, cleaning, anamorphic transfer, etc.), which is disappointing since he clearly could have done better, and we know this is true even before seeing the results."

The way I see it is that it's good news that he's not going to crank up the film grain removal, and re-colour the entire film yet again.