logo Sign In

Post #227583

Author
none
Parent topic
Help: looking for... TATOOINE OR BUST
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/227583/action/topic#227583
Date created
20-Jul-2006, 9:29 AM
Is there some connection between the naming convention "baby hum" and Star Wars i'm not getting? I personally understand the difference between officially sanctioned LFL material and fan created material on SW, but i've never gotten the sense that the baby hum releases we're going to stick to SW forever. (I know there was a thread on preserving Miyazaki, started by baby hum for instance) I've always viewed the names people use to preserve stuff as their mark to show what they appreciate. If those nameing conventions go away from material i'm not interested in, so be it. But i guess the completeist in many of us (it's nice to view the covers in chronological order which all have a common theme...), would like one name to be only for one type of material. But there's bound to be disagreements along the way. Can always 'inverse' the cover art to show off the aprocraphal nature of non official LFL material. I'm happy in whatever format/naming convention the re-creator puts it out as.
none