Originally posted by: Invader Jenny
And I think that is where the films fail with me personally. I'm starting to see why people wouldn't think of SR as fondly as they would their 1978 and 1980 films. I saw Sups I and II after I saw SR so it just adds to the pile. Those films are very campy, but it turns out they were supposed to be. Ahhh...I see. I get it now.
Originally posted by: Mike O
The campyness is part of the film's charm. The first was certainly very campy.
The campyness is part of the film's charm. The first was certainly very campy.
And I think that is where the films fail with me personally. I'm starting to see why people wouldn't think of SR as fondly as they would their 1978 and 1980 films. I saw Sups I and II after I saw SR so it just adds to the pile. Those films are very campy, but it turns out they were supposed to be. Ahhh...I see. I get it now.
I apologize! I didn't mean to say a snobby "you don't like it because you don't understand it!" I was just saying that it was stylisically different from Singer's films, that's all. Sorry!