Originally posted by: boris
Apparently it was made in "standard definition", which would imply NTSC resolution as the USA is an NTSC country. But keep in mind the same digital master was used to create the "pan and scan" releases (NTSC and PAL), which implies there was enough detail for that.
The PAL LD's *do* have more detail in them, however it can be speculated that even though this is the case they were still resized from NTSC resolution.
Please explain how this is possible.Apparently it was made in "standard definition", which would imply NTSC resolution as the USA is an NTSC country. But keep in mind the same digital master was used to create the "pan and scan" releases (NTSC and PAL), which implies there was enough detail for that.
Originally posted by: boris
You could conclude that they must have used a source higher in resolution then SD NTSC for the Pan & Scan releases...
Aren't these two statements contradictory?Originally posted by: borisYou could conclude that they must have used a source higher in resolution then SD NTSC for the Pan & Scan releases...
The PAL LD's *do* have more detail in them, however it can be speculated that even though this is the case they were still resized from NTSC resolution.