logo Sign In

Post #225016

Author
Invader Jenny
Parent topic
SUPERMAN RETURNS REVIEW
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/225016/action/topic#225016
Date created
7-Jul-2006, 10:42 PM
Originally posted by: Darth Chaltab
Eh, the only real problem I had with the film was the plot... Luthor's plan was way out there even for Lex Luthor,

Really? Not even his first movie's "I'm going to hijack a nuclear missile and blow up San Andrea's fault so that california sinks in to the ocean?" *rolls eyes*

Originally posted by: TheSessler
I agree, they could have at least left his son to a sequel or something down the road, but bringing him out in the first film in the "re-boot" of the franchise wasn't the smartest thing, in my opinion.


I thought it made perfect timing. I mean, wouldn't the audiance think it confusing that Lois all of a sudden had a son that wasn't even mentioned in the previous movie? If they were going to put Sups son in the continuing story line it would have to be in this one. The next movie down the road wouldn't make any sense, you know?


Personally, all I want is a sequel to this movie (and of course a third one). As long as that happens, I don't care what people say about this movie. I mean dispite some of the bad-mouthing this movie seems to be getting from people, in it's first 7 days it made over 106 million bucks. Obviously it still has to make back the 200 million that was spent, but along with it's final run + the international money it will make, I know it will at least break even. This movie alone has blown IMAX box office records out of the water. Even Star Wars Episode III couldn't do that.
I know this movie won't be a flop. Okay, it's no "Spider-Man" but it's no "Dare Devil" either. If they can make a sequel to "The Mask" I think they'll make a sequel to this movie. And that will make me very happy.