logo Sign In

Post #224088

Author
Vigo
Parent topic
Explaining the shoddy OOT treatment in public
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/224088/action/topic#224088
Date created
3-Jul-2006, 5:36 PM
Originally posted by: Zion
Claim: The Laserdisc masters is the way how the OOT looked in theatres back then.

Answer: Absolutely not. The original trilogy was released to theaters in 35mm and 70mm film formats. A standard 35mm film copy can hold as much picture information as a HDTV image. 35mm negatives or 1st generation copies can even yield 3 times the resolution. If someone would request an OOT release which matches the theatrical experience, one would have to request at least a HDTV transfer. No to mention those people, who saw the 70mm release of Star Wars back then...

This doesn't make any sense to me. The answer seems to go off on a tangent about HDTV when the claim makes no allusions to it at all. Of course the film looked better in the theater than on home video. To ask for an HD transfer of it is justified, but to me the claim is only referring to the version of the film, not its resolution.


Well, the claim states "The Laserdisc masters is the way how the OOT looked in theatres back then", which refers to the picture quality. Sorry if I didn´t make it clear enough, I´m no native english speaker, and have still flaws in my ability to express my exact thoughts. For technical skilled people, of course this claim doesn´t make sense. But there is a frightening large group of people out there, who honestly think that Star Wars was released in shoddy video quality in theaters, and have absolutely no technical knowledge about video and film formats. Those people keep repeating "But they are in the same quality as seen in theatres back then, so stop whining!". I´m always trying to restrain myself from getting too emotional when i´m confronted with such a large degree of ignorance.