Originally posted by: MeBeJedi
LOL. greencapt, you're killing me. I hope I never piss you off.

C'mon MBJ... you could never do that! Well, I suppose if you did something atrocious like taking a classic film.. maybe 'Star Wars' and fan-editing in a bunch of CGI or changing the whole nature of characters with shoddy effects inserts or the like... then THAT might piss me off!

As for 'Sixth Sense', aside from the 'surprise' ending its actually a very plodding and sometimes downright boring film. I'm one of those people who *gasp* figured it out in the first five minutes ('gee,' I thought 'Bruce Willis' character just took a generally fatal chest shot... and then suddenly its a year later or whatever with NO mention of it whatsoever.. and we know the kid sees dead people' Hmm) and I spent the rest of the film *hoping* the director would prove me wrong with something more clever than a poor Twilight Zone ending and clever ad campaign. "Don't reveal the secret ending to your friends folks because we need all the ticket sales we can get!" Hell I admire 'The Blair Witch Project' more because of the way the duped the public into wanted... needing... to see such a piece of shit film as it was. Both are examples of the ultimate 'water-cooler' moment movies... you have to see them because *everybody* is talking about them. Sigh. But digression aside 'Sixth Sense', from a cinematography point of view, was indeed a *clever* movie with passable acting jobs. 'Bruce... act, like, you know... dead but not dead.' 'Haley (what did your parents have sex the last time the comet came around?) act like scared and stuff but quiet. You know?

George Lucas: "Faster. More Intense."
M. Night: "Slower. More Intense."

I had a one-word review of 'Unbreakable' (and this from a comic book geek).... 'Unwatchable'.