Originally posted by: chrisdo

Are you joking? Real life is... real life. Are you saying that a computer generated White House would be more real than the real White House? Real is real, I don't know what else you'd want beyond this.

I've been talking about perfection. The CGI Whitzehouse will definitely look better than the original. It is not real, it looks better. In reality there is a lot of dirt no matter how much you clean it

)

I like the perfection of cgi graphics and at least they look much better than those old muppet tricks

)

Chris

You are the single most shallow poster I've ever seen. A sparkling clean whithouse looks more real than one with dirt on it? Yeah right. I wouldn't believe it to be real if there weren't some imperfections on it. For example, on the 2004 DVD's, C3PO has no dirt on him AT ALL at any time. In the OOT, he's dirty much of the time, which makes a lot more sense. He's been in battles and the desert for a long time.

And you say CGI is perfect? I'm sorry, but CGI always seems to stick out like a sore thumb. In ROTJ spec. ed., Jabba says "Do that again," and suddenly, everyone looks completely different, and a lot more rubbery. There is no perfection in CGI. And if you think I'm some old man who doesn't like the new ways, i'm not. I'm 13, and I'm not shallow enough to be impressed by big fake computer-generated creatures like Jar-Jar. Come to think of it, you probably have a Jar-Jar doll you sleep with at night, and most likely wish that they'd replace Han-Solo with Jar-Jar in the next special edition.