Originally posted by: Doctor M
Also your films being 4% faster are paced differently than the director intended.
Watching them in your home is different from what the director intended also. Watching ntsc with the 2:3 pulldown is different to what the director intended. I find it interesting you say beta was better - but was it really? Or is that just an opinion? Beta was released before VHS and, so, for a time was the standard - consumers when given the choice preferred VHS, so explain that. And at any rate, it's probably true to say Video 2000 was much better then either VHS or Beta.Also your films being 4% faster are paced differently than the director intended.
JVC's D-VHS is better quality then either HD-DVD or Blu-Ray could ever hope to be (and it's been available for 8 years now), yet people won't go back to a tape format.