logo Sign In

Post #211130

Author
Je
Parent topic
Should Lucus make 4,5 and 6 over?
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/211130/action/topic#211130
Date created
18-May-2006, 4:08 PM
You can't call the bullshit SE editions a make over. III is much better than IV went IV should be better than III. Listen up, leave the story of IV the same just change little thing like obi not recognizing the droids, him telling luke that his father wanted him to have his lightsaber, and the WEAK ASS battle of vader & obi. V story really doesn't need to be changed just maybe little parts like luke getting tongued by his sister and the vader fight. How did luke even put up a fight in V with vader and he just learned about the force. In II anakin learned the force for 10 years and didn't even put up a fight with the count. In III anakin took on all of these jedi in the temple and won (one scene they show him fighting three at one time). So how in the hell did weak as luke even get a hit off. It kind of made vader look weak. VI story is good but the part I have a problem is obi saying he found anakin and took it upon HIMself to train anakin. That part really needs to change because it makes obi look like a liar. Its so much they can do to make IV,V and VI better by making them over instead of fucking with the originals but I would rather them fuck with the originals if they don't make them over. (to many errors in IV,V and VI)