- Time
- Post link
Video Games - a general discussion thread — Page 95
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
Originally posted by: Number20
Agreed, Jedi Sage. Nintendo is the only family console left, and the only innovative one. Sony and Microsoft aren't. That is why the Nintendo Wii/Revoultion is the only next-gen console I'm looking forward to. And I've spent years hating Nintendo, but the latest product may be the one I finally get.
Agreed, Jedi Sage. Nintendo is the only family console left, and the only innovative one. Sony and Microsoft aren't. That is why the Nintendo Wii/Revoultion is the only next-gen console I'm looking forward to. And I've spent years hating Nintendo, but the latest product may be the one I finally get.
How could anyone haTE NINTENDO!!!!!!!!
- Time
- Post link
Originally posted by: sean wookie
How could anyone haTE NINTENDO!!!!!!!!
How could anyone haTE NINTENDO!!!!!!!!
WORD!
-x- I aim to misbehave -x- www.gamerworld.se -x-
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
Granted, it's not QUITE the same thing, but everyone knows where they got the idea from, and I don't buy for a minute it has a thing to do with 'innovation'....
On the other hand, the fact that the PS3 costs over $500 for their version of the core system ('nother rip off there), I really dont' think Nintendo has anything to worry about.
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
But ripping off Nintendo and charging $500 bucks for the least expensive version is where the line is drawn by Chaltab. Which is me.
- Time
- Post link
I don't like Nintendo, because of their anti-trust business practices of the past that forced great systems of the past such as the Sega Master System, TG16, and Atari Lynx out of the market. So no, I'm not a Nintendo fan.
I do, however, actually have a Gameboy Advance, and a Super Nintendo packed away somewere, that was a gift. So no, I haven't missed out on the last 20 years. I just don't like Nintendo personally.
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
Better graphics and more stuff (reputation matters, riding horses?) just doesn't seem like enough to make me get it, which is kind of depressing.
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
I mean, some games are worth the price and more.
The best $100 we've spent, I think, was on GTA: SA(we played the first copy so much until it kinda disintegrated).
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
Originally posted by: Darth Chaltab
Heck yes. Sony, your system can do some pretty amazing stuff. And you almost had me sold.
But ripping off Nintendo and charging $500 bucks for the least expensive version is where the line is drawn by Chaltab. Which is me.
Heck yes. Sony, your system can do some pretty amazing stuff. And you almost had me sold.
But ripping off Nintendo and charging $500 bucks for the least expensive version is where the line is drawn by Chaltab. Which is me.
Quoting Jean Luc Picard "The line must be drawn here!!".
- Time
- Post link
Originally posted by: Jagdlieter
Why was it $100?
Why was it $100?
Because the first one bit the dust and we bought another copy.
- Time
- Post link
I'd gladly pay you to take it off your hands.
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
My first reaction was WOW, I thought this game was supposed to suck! Has anyone here played it? (sorry for the hi-res)



From looking at these...how could they NOT be making a kickass sequel to Starcraft for the PC?
- Time
- Post link
I'd love a sequel to StarCraft, but I can't imagine a better balance than the original - the expansion just threw it all out.
http://www.myspace.com/red_ajax
- Time
- Post link
