Actually, it's your logic. I simply applied it to another scenario. Perhaps now you see the problem with your logic?
"If anything we should take that to mean that Hayden will replace Sebastian shaw in this release as well but of course that is just nonsensical assumptions."
Nope, not the point I was making with your logic. I guess you don't see the problem. It's not what they are saying about the DVDs, it's what they aren't that concerns me. More will likely be known as time goes on, but the Hayden change, which was leaked several months before the actual release, wasn't proven to be true until about 2 weeks before the actual release. Don't you find it interesting that LFL kept a lid on that little nugget for so long? What would be the point?
"The difference is that mine has a logical process to it. You other people are just saying "1993!?! OH NOZ! THAT MEANS LASERDISK!!11!""
Ah, blanket accusations. Does that also fit into your "logical process"? I never said anything like that. I just find it interesting that a specific date was mentioned.
"Uh, i wasnt talking about video quality i was talking about content."
So then it doesn't matter to you what the quality of said content is? To me, the two should go hand in hand. I'm weird that way. Point of fact, the only P&S DVD I own is Remo Williams, because I'm pretty sure there will never be a Special Edition of that film later on. Other than that, I buy widescreen and nothing else. Hell, I don't even own Muppet Treasure Island, despite it being one of my favorite muppet films (Tim Curry!
). I bring this up because I recall a press release saying a widescreen version was coming. I should check in on that. 
"The 1993=Laserdisk argument is completely idiotic. Because thats all there is to it--there was a Laserdisk released in 1993; therefore the dvd will that. Huh?? Real solid evidence guys."
Again, I never stated this, but it is a possibility. It's equally idiotic to state matter of factly that it won't be a laserdisc rip, right?