Originally posted by: MeBeJedi
"LASERDISK RIPS? WHERE IS THAT MENTIONED IN THE NEWS RELEASE??"
You mean like the press release that stated Shaw was replaced with Hayden prior to the '04 DVD release? I don't recall seeing that one either.
So because the previous DVD failed to mention Hayden replaced Sebastian shaw that means that we will recieve an LD-transfer?? Where is the logic in that?? If anything we should take that to mean that Hayden will replace Sebastian shaw in this release as well but of course that is just nonsensical assumptions.
"LASERDISK RIPS? WHERE IS THAT MENTIONED IN THE NEWS RELEASE??"
You mean like the press release that stated Shaw was replaced with Hayden prior to the '04 DVD release? I don't recall seeing that one either.
So because the previous DVD failed to mention Hayden replaced Sebastian shaw that means that we will recieve an LD-transfer?? Where is the logic in that?? If anything we should take that to mean that Hayden will replace Sebastian shaw in this release as well but of course that is just nonsensical assumptions.
"I'll tell you what Ward's comments MOST LIKELY mean."
Interesting. You blast other people's interpretation, and now give your own. Didn't you just say, in the very same post, that "NO ONE KNOWS WHAT THE VIDEO WILL BE LIKE!"
The difference is that mine has a logical process to it. You other people are just saying "1993!?! OH NOZ! THAT MEANS LASERDISK!!11!" Again, how does that equal Laserdisk? If they wanted to use Laserdisk it would stand to reason that they would use the THX remasters from 1995. Nothing about "1993=Laserdisk" makes any sense.
And I also reinforced that even my hypothesis is unconfirmed. Notice the giant captial MOST LIKELY. But looking at it logically it is the most logical conclusion to be drawn, but given that nearly everything about the video is unconfirmed this is not definite until we actually find out.
"We got what we wanted, and more i might add"
"NO ONE KNOWS WHAT THE VIDEO WILL BE LIKE!"
Interesting. You blast other people's interpretation, and now give your own. Didn't you just say, in the very same post, that "NO ONE KNOWS WHAT THE VIDEO WILL BE LIKE!"
The difference is that mine has a logical process to it. You other people are just saying "1993!?! OH NOZ! THAT MEANS LASERDISK!!11!" Again, how does that equal Laserdisk? If they wanted to use Laserdisk it would stand to reason that they would use the THX remasters from 1995. Nothing about "1993=Laserdisk" makes any sense.
And I also reinforced that even my hypothesis is unconfirmed. Notice the giant captial MOST LIKELY. But looking at it logically it is the most logical conclusion to be drawn, but given that nearly everything about the video is unconfirmed this is not definite until we actually find out.
"NO ONE KNOWS WHAT THE VIDEO WILL BE LIKE!"
"We got what we wanted, and more i might add"
"NO ONE KNOWS WHAT THE VIDEO WILL BE LIKE!"
Uh, i wasnt talking about video quality i was talking about content. We asked for the OOT--we got the freakin O-OOT, the one we NEVER even expected to get on video ever!
There is a great difference between bashing Lucasfilm for giving us LD-transfers and actually logically working through the information and arriving at a temporary hypothesis and when you actually look at it rationally you can see that there is no reason to believe it will be LD-rips. So if its not LD-rips then what is it? Again, using evidence and logic you can reason that the most likely explaination is that it will be a new telecine from the 1993 print.
The 1993=Laserdisk argument is completely idiotic. Because thats all there is to it--there was a Laserdisk released in 1993; therefore the dvd will that. Huh?? Real solid evidence guys.