logo Sign In

Post #200115

Author
Warbler
Parent topic
Violence VS. Non-Violence ~~~ Debate
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/200115/action/topic#200115
Date created
11-Apr-2006, 6:37 PM
Originally posted by: Jagdlieter

It definitely could be, I used the words 'doesn't HAVE to' so I wouldn't be debating this point though. There are times when it's necessary, and times when it's not.

huh? your reply did not make sense. And you orginally said:

Originally posted by: Jagdlieter

You don't have to FIGHT in order to fight for what is good and decent.


You also never answered this question:

Originally posted by: Warbler
I saw a trailer for a new tonight, it is about flight 93. That is the fourth plane that was taken over by terrorists on 911. That plane was headed most probably for the White House. The only reason the White House stands today and 100's more didn't die on 911 is because the people on that plane fought back. Were they wrong?