Just like with the Hayden ghost thing, you're being far too literal with our meaning! I don't think anyone here doesn't accept the fact that George can legally change the movies as much as he wants. He owns them. To be honest, I admit that I envy him for being able to own his films, unlike other directors/writers whose films belong to the studios they make them for. But he's abused his own property so much that you begin to wonder if it's truly a good idea. But, yes, legally, he can do what he wants. That doesn't necessarily make it right for him to do so. We know we don't truly own the Star Wars movies, but we have a responsibility to them. We're the reason they exist. And he depends on us to keep making them. He's released them to us, but now he just acts like he's driving a cart, and we're his horse, and he's just dangling the carrot in front of us. And that seems right to you?