- Time
- Post link
and now back to Superman....
up, up and oi vey!
and now back to Superman....
up, up and oi vey!
Red heads ROCK. Blondes do not rock. Nuff said.
Superman Movie — Page 7
and now back to Superman....
up, up and oi vey!
- Time
- Post link
Originally posted by: greencapt
LOL- You've got mail!
and now back to Superman....
up, up and oi vey!
LOL- You've got mail!
and now back to Superman....
up, up and oi vey!
Thank you, greencapt. This is much more space sufficient.
SUPERMAN: "Zod, you are now the Gimp!"
Red heads ROCK. Blondes do not rock. Nuff said.
- Time
- Post link
Originally posted by: Han Solo VS Indiana Jones
Thank you, greencapt. This is much more space sufficient.
Glad you liked it!
SUPERMAN: "Zod, you are now the Gimp!"
Thank you, greencapt. This is much more space sufficient.
Glad you liked it!
SUPERMAN: "Zod, you are now the Gimp!"
Poor Chancellor Valorum... being man-handled by the Man of Steel.
- Time
- Post link
Originally posted by: greencapt
Poor Chancellor Valorum... being man-handled by the Man of Steel.
Originally posted by: Han Solo VS Indiana Jones
Thank you, greencapt. This is much more space sufficient.
Glad you liked it!
SUPERMAN: "Zod, you are now the Gimp!"
Thank you, greencapt. This is much more space sufficient.
Glad you liked it!
SUPERMAN: "Zod, you are now the Gimp!"
Poor Chancellor Valorum... being man-handled by the Man of Steel.
That's what happens when you appear in a Star Wars prequel. At least he was smart enough to get out after just one. "Actors prefer to work with actors." I love that quote.
To be honest, I would rather have seen General Zod as the Emperor instead of Ian McDiarmid.
Red heads ROCK. Blondes do not rock. Nuff said.
- Time
- Post link
Originally posted by: Han Solo VS Indiana Jones
To be honest, I would rather have seen General Zod as the Emperor instead of Ian McDiarmid.
To be honest, I would rather have seen General Zod as the Emperor instead of Ian McDiarmid.
Did you see 'Haunted Mansion'? Maybe not the greatest film in the world overall but Stamp was great in it!
- Time
- Post link
Originally posted by: greencapt
Did you see 'Haunted Mansion'? Maybe not the greatest film in the world overall but Stamp was great in it!
Originally posted by: Han Solo VS Indiana Jones
To be honest, I would rather have seen General Zod as the Emperor instead of Ian McDiarmid.
To be honest, I would rather have seen General Zod as the Emperor instead of Ian McDiarmid.
Did you see 'Haunted Mansion'? Maybe not the greatest film in the world overall but Stamp was great in it!
The 60s version or the remake?
Red heads ROCK. Blondes do not rock. Nuff said.
- Time
- Post link
Originally posted by: Han Solo VS Indiana Jones
The 60s version or the remake?
The 60s version or the remake?
The Disney film from 2003 with Eddie Murphy. http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0338094/
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
Originally posted by: ADigitalMan
HSvIJ, you ought to edit that earlier post and remove your email before you start getting spam. Just a little recommendation.
HSvIJ, you ought to edit that earlier post and remove your email before you start getting spam. Just a little recommendation.
Done and done. Here's hoping it's not too late.
Red heads ROCK. Blondes do not rock. Nuff said.
- Time
- Post link
During interviews at this past weekend's WonderCon, "Superman Returns" director Bryan Singer has denied rumors that the film's budget has gone over $250 million or talk of extensive reshoots.
"There's some idiot [who] wrote somewhere that the movie was $250 million, which is the most absurd thing I've ever heard. I'll tell you exactly: The movie was budgeted at $184.5 million and will probably climb with visual effects and variables that occur in a movie of this magnitude, with 1,400 visual effects, etc., to somewhere still south of $200 million. Which is still a great deal of money, but it is by no means ... what was published in that" said the director.
As for the extensive reshoot talk? "There were none. We're probably going to do one day of pickup in Los Angeles, but there was none. What I did was I switched my schedule. I had shot for about 105 or 107 days. Originally, I was going to shoot for 128 days, 130 days, And instead, I stopped. I decided, because I was so exhausted and the process was so long, I was starting to lose my objectivity. So I shortened the schedule and stopped shooting after ... what I believe was 107 days. And then came back to Los Angeles for about three and a half weeks, and then went back and finished the schedule in Sydney".
"There's some idiot [who] wrote somewhere that the movie was $250 million, which is the most absurd thing I've ever heard. I'll tell you exactly: The movie was budgeted at $184.5 million and will probably climb with visual effects and variables that occur in a movie of this magnitude, with 1,400 visual effects, etc., to somewhere still south of $200 million. Which is still a great deal of money, but it is by no means ... what was published in that" said the director.
As for the extensive reshoot talk? "There were none. We're probably going to do one day of pickup in Los Angeles, but there was none. What I did was I switched my schedule. I had shot for about 105 or 107 days. Originally, I was going to shoot for 128 days, 130 days, And instead, I stopped. I decided, because I was so exhausted and the process was so long, I was starting to lose my objectivity. So I shortened the schedule and stopped shooting after ... what I believe was 107 days. And then came back to Los Angeles for about three and a half weeks, and then went back and finished the schedule in Sydney".
from Dark Horizons
Of course my heart sank again when I read this morning that Singer will re-start work on his 'Logan's Run' remake as his next project... but that's a bitch for another thread!
- Time
- Post link
Originally posted by: greencapt
I still have many MANY doubts about this film, but at least I can respect filmmakers who seem to honestly answer questions:
from Dark Horizons
Of course my heart sank again when I read this morning that Singer will re-start work on his 'Logan's Run' remake as his next project... but that's a bitch for another thread!
I still have many MANY doubts about this film, but at least I can respect filmmakers who seem to honestly answer questions:
During interviews at this past weekend's WonderCon, "Superman Returns" director Bryan Singer has denied rumors that the film's budget has gone over $250 million or talk of extensive reshoots.
"There's some idiot [who] wrote somewhere that the movie was $250 million, which is the most absurd thing I've ever heard. I'll tell you exactly: The movie was budgeted at $184.5 million and will probably climb with visual effects and variables that occur in a movie of this magnitude, with 1,400 visual effects, etc., to somewhere still south of $200 million. Which is still a great deal of money, but it is by no means ... what was published in that" said the director.
As for the extensive reshoot talk? "There were none. We're probably going to do one day of pickup in Los Angeles, but there was none. What I did was I switched my schedule. I had shot for about 105 or 107 days. Originally, I was going to shoot for 128 days, 130 days, And instead, I stopped. I decided, because I was so exhausted and the process was so long, I was starting to lose my objectivity. So I shortened the schedule and stopped shooting after ... what I believe was 107 days. And then came back to Los Angeles for about three and a half weeks, and then went back and finished the schedule in Sydney".
"There's some idiot [who] wrote somewhere that the movie was $250 million, which is the most absurd thing I've ever heard. I'll tell you exactly: The movie was budgeted at $184.5 million and will probably climb with visual effects and variables that occur in a movie of this magnitude, with 1,400 visual effects, etc., to somewhere still south of $200 million. Which is still a great deal of money, but it is by no means ... what was published in that" said the director.
As for the extensive reshoot talk? "There were none. We're probably going to do one day of pickup in Los Angeles, but there was none. What I did was I switched my schedule. I had shot for about 105 or 107 days. Originally, I was going to shoot for 128 days, 130 days, And instead, I stopped. I decided, because I was so exhausted and the process was so long, I was starting to lose my objectivity. So I shortened the schedule and stopped shooting after ... what I believe was 107 days. And then came back to Los Angeles for about three and a half weeks, and then went back and finished the schedule in Sydney".
from Dark Horizons
Of course my heart sank again when I read this morning that Singer will re-start work on his 'Logan's Run' remake as his next project... but that's a bitch for another thread!
More and more remakes.... yay (not)
Red heads ROCK. Blondes do not rock. Nuff said.
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
"I'VE GROWN TIRED OF ASKING, SO THIS WILL BE THE LAST TIME..."
The Mangler Bros. Psycho Dayv Armchaireviews Notes on Suicide
- Time
- Post link
Red heads ROCK. Blondes do not rock. Nuff said.
- Time
- Post link
The very original Superman costume
1940s Superman
Max Fleischer Superman
1950s Superman
1970s Superman
1980s Comic Book Superman
Superman Red & Blue
Red Son Superman
After Doomsday Fight Superman
Superman Reborn
British Superman
Batman/Superman Composite
Kingdom Come Superman
Brandon Routh as...
Green Lantern
Batman
Aquaman
Flash
Booster Gold
Blue Beetle
Neo
Mega Man
Captain Planet
Captain America
Ghost Rider
Random X-Men guy
Sam Fisher
Space Ghost
The Tick
Deep Space 9 Star Fleet Officer
Solid Snake
Mysterio
Mighty Mouse
Red heads ROCK. Blondes do not rock. Nuff said.
- Time
- Post link
This one reminds me of TRON.
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
Originally posted by: sean wookie
I wish they could make Jack Nicolson as the joker in the BB sequel.
I wish they could make Jack Nicolson as the joker in the BB sequel.
Don't we all...
Red heads ROCK. Blondes do not rock. Nuff said.
- Time
- Post link
Red heads ROCK. Blondes do not rock. Nuff said.
- Time
- Post link
Originally posted by: Han Solo VS Indiana Jones
Don't we all...
Originally posted by: sean wookie
I wish they could make Jack Nicolson as the joker in the BB sequel.
I wish they could make Jack Nicolson as the joker in the BB sequel.
Don't we all...
Who else plays insane villians better?
- Time
- Post link
Originally posted by: Han Solo VS Indiana Jones
Don't we all...
Originally posted by: sean wookie
I wish they could make Jack Nicolson as the joker in the BB sequel.
I wish they could make Jack Nicolson as the joker in the BB sequel.
Don't we all...
Nope, we all don't.
Though he was pretty good, Jack as the Joker seemed more like Jack Nicholson being Jack Nicholson to me, if that makes any sense.
Also, the character in Batman just wasn't insane enough, or evil enough.
The Joker is a sick, twisted, and an utterly uncurable psychopathic killer, and Jack didn't capture that IMO. Or, at least, to the extent that he should have.
- Time
- Post link
Originally posted by: TheSessler
Nope, we all don't.
Though he was pretty good, Jack as the Joker seemed more like Jack Nicholson being Jack Nicholson to me, if that makes any sense.
Also, the character in Batman just wasn't insane enough, or evil enough.
The Joker is a sick, twisted, and an utterly uncurable psychopathic killer, and Jack didn't capture that IMO. Or, at least, to the extent that he should have.
Originally posted by: Han Solo VS Indiana Jones
Don't we all...
Originally posted by: sean wookie
I wish they could make Jack Nicolson as the joker in the BB sequel.
I wish they could make Jack Nicolson as the joker in the BB sequel.
Don't we all...
Nope, we all don't.
Though he was pretty good, Jack as the Joker seemed more like Jack Nicholson being Jack Nicholson to me, if that makes any sense.
Also, the character in Batman just wasn't insane enough, or evil enough.
The Joker is a sick, twisted, and an utterly uncurable psychopathic killer, and Jack didn't capture that IMO. Or, at least, to the extent that he should have.
Should we start a different thread to talk about the Batman movies?
Red heads ROCK. Blondes do not rock. Nuff said.
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
Originally posted by: TheSessler
Nah, it'll just end up veering to the Superman movies anyway.
Nah, it'll just end up veering to the Superman movies anyway.
Just making sure. Cause, you know, "chatter".
Info below on "Superman: Still Here" (found this at the Superman boards for SuperheroHype.com):
Variety announces the further adventures of the Flying Rat and the Big Blue Bird! Also a bit on LOGAN'S RUN!
Hey folks, Harry here... believe it or not... and obviously we believe it, cuz this is one of those huge NO SHIT SHERLOCK announcements - which I can only think is meant to get a bump in Time/Warners' stock prices... but whatever, it's still good to hear that sequels are lined up for both BATMAN and SUPERMAN franchises... with Christopher Nolan and Bryan Singer both on board their respective properties.
BATMAN STILL SLUGGING is apparently being based on a treatment that Christopher Nolan (working on THE PRESTIGE) and David Goyer (just finished THE INVISIBLE and set to write & direct THE FLASH) did before they went to their respective upcoming projects. Meanwhile - Jonah Nolan, bro to Christopher - has been clacking away on the sequel script to the caped crusader. No mention of characters, plot or anything other than the fact that Christian Bale would return. The article in Variety didn't give a single twinge of a mention regarding when and where this next tale would shoot or start.
Meanwhile, SUPERMAN STILL HERE is set to shoot after Bryan Singer finishes his remake of LOGAN'S RUN, which begins shooting this September reportedly! Can Not Wait for that one. Meanwhile - there's no word in the article if Michael Dougherty and Dan Harris will be back for scripting duties on the big boy scout's latest series of good deed doing. However, I'd bet on them being back. Dougherty was seen holding hands with Sarah Douglas... albeit briefly last night. Word has it. Mike is all aflutter. Ursa apparently has additional abilities not shown in SUPERMAN II. The mind boggles. After all, she's like the evil-super-Barbarella!
Red heads ROCK. Blondes do not rock. Nuff said.