Originally posted by: PSYCHO_DAYV
I PEDICTED A STEELERS WIN, AND THEY DID. RICARDO HAS TIVO, SO WE REWATCHED THE "QUESTIONABLE" TOUCHDOWN. THERE'S NO WAY THAT HE CROSSED THE PLANE. EVEN IF YOU TAKE THE SEVEN POINTS AWAY THEY MOST LIKELY WOULD HAVE MADE A FIELD GOAL MAKING THE FINAL SCORE 17-10 IN FAVOR OF THE STEELERS. SEATTLE MISSED TWO FIELD GOALS, AND JUST HAD TOO MANY DAMN PENALTIES.
I PEDICTED A STEELERS WIN, AND THEY DID. RICARDO HAS TIVO, SO WE REWATCHED THE "QUESTIONABLE" TOUCHDOWN. THERE'S NO WAY THAT HE CROSSED THE PLANE. EVEN IF YOU TAKE THE SEVEN POINTS AWAY THEY MOST LIKELY WOULD HAVE MADE A FIELD GOAL MAKING THE FINAL SCORE 17-10 IN FAVOR OF THE STEELERS. SEATTLE MISSED TWO FIELD GOALS, AND JUST HAD TOO MANY DAMN PENALTIES.
To me it looked like the ball barely crossed the plane while he was in the air. Thing is, is the replay did not show clear and inconvertable evidence that the ball did not cross the plane. The ruling on the field was a touchdown. By NFL rules, in order to overturn the ruling on the field, the replay must should clear and inconvertable evidence that the ruling on the field was wrong. I think you'll agree that the replay does not show clear and inconvertable evidence that the ball did not cross the plane.