logo Sign In

Post #176897

Author
Scotty Balls
Parent topic
ROTS and the Oscars!
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/176897/action/topic#176897
Date created
3-Feb-2006, 12:01 PM


2 years in a row, nominated for a few, won a couple, but not really cleaning up. 3rd time lucky, wins everything it's nominated for. PATHETIC... 3 wasn't even the best one (as it's a trilogy, it's all one film). It's absolutely worthless behaviour that shows just how ridiculous the 'Academy' is.


I'm inclined to the that the Academy looked at LOTR the same way I do. LOTR is ONE movie cut into 3 parts because of the length. Tolkein intended LOTR to be published as 1 novel. It was published as 3 seperate books because it was too long to be just 1 book. And just for the record (IMHO) LOTR completely blew away the prequals in EVERY WAY. Better script, better direction, better SPFX & better performances from the cast.

Agree or disagree with me if you want, It makes no difference. As far as I'm concerned, starting with his work on LOTR & confirmed by King Kong (yes, I know that he's done other films before LOTR), Peter Jackson has become the filmmaker that Luc-a$$ always wished he COULD be.