Originally posted by: zombie84
Anyway, what i was starting with was that Kershner is definitly NOT to blame, and everything good about the film, everything that sets it apart from the rest, comes from him. The problems on the set all go back to Kurtz, if any one individual is to blame.
Anyway, what i was starting with was that Kershner is definitly NOT to blame, and everything good about the film, everything that sets it apart from the rest, comes from him. The problems on the set all go back to Kurtz, if any one individual is to blame.
i don't agree with you Kurtz was doing his job has a "creative" producer,he gave time to Kershner to shoot and to the actors to improve their perfomances and really work on the script (something that Lucas don't understand) by the time lucas was already becoming a "buisnessman" thinking about making a movie "good enough" for the audience, Lucas wanted it to be "as good as" while Kurtz wanted it to be "better than".