If the movie inside your head is different from the actual movie then that’s that.
For anyone interested it’s actually two scenes, this video until 30 seconds in:
https://youtu.be/mwFVVyHgMAI?si=lq-3MNp4MTfnRdo2Then this video from 1:06 to 1:30
https://youtu.be/rU_wrhQrDh4?si=jTLMf6YaAJSZxuisNotice how, like I said, there’s actually MORE lines telling Qui Gon it’s important than dismissing it. The dismissal has exactly two lines, one from Ki Adi, and one from Mace.
I didn’t say they dismissed it. I said more a dismissive view of it and “a bit dismissive”. I think I even said that I don’t necessarily think that means they be depicted as overly dismissive.
What’s wrong with someone having a perception of a movie’s intentions that they think is presented within the movie? Why does that equal, in your words, being “movie inside your head” (I think that’s a bit of a dismissing approach to the discussion)? I said why I think it’s there. You even acknowledge that those moments happen. I think you put more stock in another part of the situation than I do. I think the weight of the scene and how it begins says more to me than the end of the scene. As you acknowledge Mace says that they’ll look into it after Yoda’s suggests the dark side is hard to see.
I think the vibe you’re thinking of is their attitude toward Anakin, which is consistently there and takes up much more time in those scenes and between those scenes. They actually discount Anakin to talk more about Naboo/Maul in the second video, “Now is not the time for this.”
I never stated here the jedi’s arrogance and dismissiveness were harsh or pompous to the degree of them being ignorant or unwilling to do anything. I didn’t state they were fully ignorant or whathaveyou. Pointed to the general structure of the situation and the characters I think they showcase. To me, the very notion that Ki-Adi says it’s impossible, and Mace moreso assumes that they wouldn’t have sensed it, I think suggests an arrogance to me. That he listens to Yoda when Yoda points out the flaw in that doesn’t change it to me. I said from early on that I think that didn’t make them bullheaded or pompous. I think, to me, it seems more like you’re perceiving it through the lens of arrogance as if it’s a harsh presented flaw rather than what I’m referring to it as, which is as a more casually flawed viewpoint.