logo Sign In

Post #1680206

Author
Shopping Maul
Parent topic
ROS is bad, yes, we know. But why is this one line the thing that people always point to?
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1680206/action/topic#1680206
Date created
14-Mar-2026, 2:29 PM

Vladius said:

“Look how invested we all got in TLJ when Holdo seemed to be a baddie, only to turn around and be secretly leading the rebels to Crait. You could create a similar tension in the sequels where Holdo comes off as a likely identity for the evil hologram lady, only to be revealed as a good guy”

“Heck, I don’t even like RoTJ!”

It’s all making more sense now

Not sure if you’re taking a shot at me here but let me clarify…

I said the RoTJ thing in fun, only because it’s ironic I’m defending the story integrity of a movie I don’t really like. But the fact remains that RoTJ is a definitive ending to the saga and is thus easily undermined by potential sequels - which is why I’m so hung up on the sequels presenting a story thread that can preserve RoTJ’s conclusions (which included the prequels’ ‘balance’ theme) whilst allowing for a continuation.

I also don’t like TLJ - but I did at least like the idea (if not necessarily the execution) of Holdo’s duality, and I thought a similar notion could work (as it did for many in TLJ) in a sequel trilogy.