Right, I received a PM letting me know you’ve replied to another of my posts…
The same still applies what you were plainly told in the George Lucas’s Sequel Trilogy thread…
Quite why you (and the other TFn guy with the similar posting style) then still continued on and on asking questions and attempted to performatively interact with me in the George Lucas’s Sequel Trilogy thread… is lost on me. It still applies here and for any other threads, too.
You may wish to question why others here are ignoring your posts - and rethink your baiting ‘posting style’ and comments. Or not, I guess…?
That’d be a pity if not - as you do make the occasional intriguing and insightful posts on TFn (in amongst the usual circle-jerking on there). Though it is up to you, of course. I won’t be holding my breath, either way.
If you feel I’ve been mistaken or harsh, then feel free to PM me if you wish - though meanwhile I (and likely others) will still simply be ignoring / scrolling past your posts on here.
You imply I may be a zealot for doing… defending the PT’s story and replying to criticisms that I think don’t apply to them. And I’ve also criticized some of PT writing as well. I respond to posts I disagree with. Why not do that? What have I said that’s bad or wrong?
What posts on TFn are you referring to?
Circle jerking on that forum? Come on, please.