logo Sign In

Post #167263

Author
Adamwankenobi
Parent topic
Indiana Jones 4
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/167263/action/topic#167263
Date created
2-Jan-2006, 8:28 PM
Originally posted by: Nanner Split
Originally posted by: Adamwankenobi
Well, let's take Young Indy, for example. Was it spectacular? No. Was it groundbreaking? No. Was it fun at times? Yes. And plus, in it, we got to see 93 year old Indy, and he wasn't an embarrasment like some say an older Indy would be. We even got to see Harrison Ford as a 50 year old Indy in one episode. Was he as bad as some say he would be? No.


But just how much action did the 93 and 50 year old Indys take part in? Were they swinging from whips, outrunning boulders, pistol-whipping Nazis and bangin' German women?


Well, that was a bad example, I suppose. No. He was too old to do those sorts of things at 93. But... at 50, he could have, they just didn't show it in the show. But, I just don't get why people have something against an older Indy. People age. It is a part of life. Naturally, Indy would get old. What on earth is so bad about an older Indy going around on adventures? To me, it would be a fitting end to the series to show a somewhat older Indy as this film will, and prove to the world that he is still ready for adventure, even at an old age.

So is Rocky...

So is Rambo...

You can't keep an old dog down...

George Bush hates old people.