- Time
- Post link
A miserable box art would be the least problem. I’m going to buy a box set twice anyway, one sealed, one to watch - and those discs would just be replaced from the official box to a custom made box.
JFS
Star Wars (1977 Original Version) Theatrical Rerelease Discussion — Page 5
- Time
- Post link
Robyroo, congratulations on being the 100th post in this thread and good morning! I can’t wait for the Star Wars Holiday Special on Blu-ray (which is part two of the four part trilogy!)
- Time
- Post link
Robyroo, congratulations on being the 100th post in this thread and good morning! I can’t wait for the Star Wars Holiday Special on Blu-ray (which is part two of the four part trilogy!)
- Time
- Post link
Sony now distributes Disney physical media via SDS, yes. But I don’t think that implies Sony is encoding the video or even authoring the discs.
My recollection was that there was no implication, the report was that they’d be encoding/authoring/pressing/packaging the discs as part of the deal. I could be remembering that wrong tho!
- Time
- Post link
A miserable box art would be the least problem. I’m going to buy a box set twice anyway, one sealed, one to watch - and those discs would just be replaced from the official box to a custom made box.
I’d be more concerned about stuff like dnr, and pink lightsabers than that.
- Time
- Post link
A miserable box art would be the least problem. I’m going to buy a box set twice anyway, one sealed, one to watch - and those discs would just be replaced from the official box to a custom made box.
I’d be more concerned about stuff like dnr, and pink lightsabers than that.
Of all the things that arrived in 2004 I think I hated that pink saber the most, for what it represented. Suck a simple quality fuck up they chose to ignore.
- Time
- Post link
Feeling a little bad for the souls that have spent years scanning and retouching every frame in 4k based on George’s lie.
- Time
- Post link
Feeling a little bad for the souls that have spent years scanning and retouching every frame in 4k based on George’s lie.
It’s not really a waste, the 4KXX series are there to preserve the actual “theatrical print” media of how the movies would’ve looked like back to audiences in 1977, 1980 and 1983. The 50th Anniversary restoration would be basically how the conformed OCN in 1977 would’ve looked like, in the highest resolution and quality possible.
- Time
- Post link
Feeling a little bad for the souls that have spent years scanning and retouching every frame in 4k based on George’s lie.
It’s not really a waste, the 4KXX series are there to preserve the actual “theatrical print” media of how the movies would’ve looked like back to audiences in 1977, 1980 and 1983. The 50th Anniversary restoration would be basically how the conformed OCN in 1977 would’ve looked like, in the highest resolution and quality possible.
I mean, if the 4K77 team had access to a higher quality copy like an interpositive, they would’ve scanned that instead.
The goal was to just get a modern HD or 4K transfer, instead of the 2006 DVDs.
They scanned theatrical prints because that’s really the only thing anyone outside of Lucasfilm has access to.
I don’t know who would prefer 4K77 once this 6K scan of the negative is released, unless you like all the extra grain, scratches, dust, and lower resolution.
- Time
- Post link
I can’t prove it, but I swore I read when George Lucas sold his company to Disney, not releasing the original cuts was a condition.
Maybe that’s true, but there was an expiration on it. Dunno.
Dr. M
- Time
- Post link
I can’t prove it, but I swore I read when George Lucas sold his company to Disney, not releasing the original cuts was a condition.
Maybe that’s true, but there was an expiration on it. Dunno.
It’s a complete myth, there’s no evidence such a clause ever existed. Unfortunately however this myth has become commonly accepted online, and it gets stated as fact frequently.
- Time
- Post link
RM4747 said:
I don’t know who would prefer 4K77 once this 6K scan of the negative is released, unless you like all the extra grain, scratches, dust, and lower resolution.
There is undeniably a level of charm to release prints. The more grindhouse-y nature of them can be a nice novelty, and for that I’ll be keeping 4K77/80/83 around. But with that said, yeah, I’‘’ take a proper 4K+ negative scan any day of the week.
“Bring my shuttle.”
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
I can’t prove it, but I swore I read when George Lucas sold his company to Disney, not releasing the original cuts was a condition.
Maybe that’s true, but there was an expiration on it. Dunno.
It stems from people at LFL being cagey about it for so long. Kennedy, Hidalgo, made weird comments when asked after the Disney sale so people naturally assumed they’d got a contractual reason behind the scenes. Unless this has recently changed or they were just saying this for personal rather than legal reasons to stay friends with George.
- Time
- Post link
old school lol
earth 1 nowadays kinda reminds me of the star wars multiverse
there are a lot of good topics in this forums
- Time
- Post link
I can’t prove it, but I swore I read when George Lucas sold his company to Disney, not releasing the original cuts was a condition.
Maybe that’s true, but there was an expiration on it. Dunno.
I’m not sure that that makes sense, because i have read in multiple places that George said (paraphrased) “the film no longer exists in its original form and that the negatives had been altered beyond restoration.”