logo Sign In

Post #1670555

Author
That guy with no name
Parent topic
Star Wars (1977 Original Version) Theatrical Rerelease Discussion
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1670555/action/topic#1670555
Date created
8-Dec-2025, 10:21 PM

RM4747 said:

That guy with no name said:

Again, that is an older leak, and we have received newer ones with updated information. The cintel was done for catalog reasons. And there have been further 8K scans of elements other than VistaVision. Again, you have limited incomplete information. Do you know about the Photochemical restoration? Of course you don’t…

I’m tired of listening to you. Quick question, who sent you to this forum to cause trouble? Because you don’t seem to understand that people can be more informed than you…

As I said earlier, no one believes you have any information without proof.

Put up or shut up.

You could easily post proof, but you don’t. For no reason other than wanting to feel special.

You can keep saying you’re more informed and you have insider knowledge, and keep claiming you have all of this proof that you can’t share (for unknown reasons) over and over and over again.

No one believes you. It’s becoming sad and desperate. Clinging to relevance.

Either post the proof, or stop talking about it.

The majority of people on this forum, besides you, believe me. And I have already told you why I haven’t released this, but you might have short-term memory, so I won’t bully you on that one, so I’ll repeat it again. (maybe write it down this time): The leaks I chose not to share on this thread have sensitive information.

Did you get that, or do I have to dumb it down for you? Maybe I need to draw it in crayon for you to understand it…

Why would I supply and allow all these leaks to be posted here, then lie about this?

Either way, this should shut you up and prove that there was in fact a new 8K scan and that it’s not just VistaVision shots as you wrongly stated: