Pretty interesting the Polygon article is clearly writing this thing because of the leaks, but doesn’t cite them (instead citing the now 10yrs old story about Edwards watching Star Wars as prep for Rogue One) - and makes sure to include this sentence
Yes, it’s 50 years old, and that original print probably wouldn’t look spectacular.
Which sucks! Gizmodo cites the Polygon story but manages to actually INFORM their readers as to why people are wondering about it (and doesn’t seem to just casually toss in the idea it’ll look bad by default, LOL)