That really is a poor comparison… 300 pages of threads over 25 years… overlooking and glossing over others who contributed to the Original Trilogy… and you compare it to an example conversation/thread on Batman v Superman?
All whilst ignoring the history of TFN with OOT fans - and outlook in general, even today - as mentioned previously.
Well, you’re in luck - there’s plenty to learn about the many contributions of others to the Original Trilogy on here. 👍
I didn’t ignore. It had nothing to do with what I said, so I didn’t respond. It doesn’t change anything about what I said, as I was speaking on individuals, not a blanketing of a collective site, and didn’t argue for the site in any way. Just pointed that members criticize Lucas there, which isn’t countered by what was said. What’s wrong with that?
You started a conversation with me re TFN…
Have you tried looking over at TFN…? 😉
Oh I bet they love us over there.
Been there. I see generally criticism of Lucas’ writing choices as well as other things. Even though the majority seems to err on the side that Lucas was a stronger creative than all of the ST writers. Which is a sentiment I think moreso similarly on.
I simply replied… and the discussion then flows and moves as they usually do. Try reading the replies without placing the onus being on yourself (there sure are a lot of 'I’s in your above post); I merely highlighted the general outlook of TFN historically, and pointed out in my last reply to you…
Well, you’re in luck - there’s plenty to learn about the many contributions of others to the Original Trilogy on here. 👍
Anyway, let’s not derail the thread further - 8/9 posts on TFN in here is likely 8/9 posts too many - and get back on topic of the thread itself: George Lucas: Star Wars Creator, Unreliable Narrator & Time Travelling Revisionist… - thank you.
Though if you’d like to continue the above conversation send me a PM. 👍