logo Sign In

Star Wars: A New Hope DEVASTATOR EDITION (V.2 a WIP) — Page 28

Author
Time

Actually, it was added for the 2004 release.

Hello!

Author
Time

Sometimes I’m just at a loss of how y’all are able to do this kind of stuff. It feels like you just spawn things out of the aether sometimes. I’m stunned.

Star Wars, Paleontology, Superhero, Godzilla fan. Darth Vader stan. 22. ADHD. College Student majoring in English Education.
My Star Wars Fan-Edits

Author
Time

Phase3 said:

hharlan23 said:

Just to be sure?

The blue tint was added for the 1997 Special Edition.
The walls are actually a brownish-red.

The walls being brownish red don’t help the fact that they are in a sickly trash compacter with vermin.

It’s probably a bit extreme or overdone the cyan or turquoise but it’s not showing up the nasty crap on the walls because green in the mids is so muted. Red Highlights remain solid. Also to Mention very bad black crush on some versions.

Just look at Chewie’s Fur in the stills posted. Much better in the 97 version. Problem with green.

Author
Time

Looks good!

Ol’ George has the GOUT, I see.

Author
Time

That guy with no name said:

New shot:
New source (19SE) re-inserted the missing falcon and adjusted the motion for a more dramatic shot.

Drive: https://drive.google.com/file/d/16CDNixUattNu7e_f3JxZWs4-hEmoWOF0/view?usp=sharing
Streamable: https://streamable.com/pvv9xw

Looks great, completely natural. Can I ask how you achieved this shot?, Was it just a case animating a still of the falcon from the frame it originally appears or was there more to it? I ask as I was trying something similar in an edit I was working on and really struggled to get a satisfactory result (even though it was small in the frame, it looked like exactly what it was, a still image being moved around and zoomed out from). Thanks.

Author
Time

Nickshimmy said:

That guy with no name said:

New shot:
New source (19SE) re-inserted the missing falcon and adjusted the motion for a more dramatic shot.

Drive: https://drive.google.com/file/d/16CDNixUattNu7e_f3JxZWs4-hEmoWOF0/view?usp=sharing
Streamable: https://streamable.com/pvv9xw

Looks great, completely natural. Can I ask how you achieved this shot?, Was it just a case animating a still of the falcon from the frame it originally appears or was there more to it? I ask as I was trying something similar in an edit I was working on and really struggled to get a satisfactory result (even though it was small in the frame, it looked like exactly what it was, a still image being moved around and zoomed out from). Thanks.

It’s an image broken into 3-4 parts that move independently to give the illusion of parallax shift, ie, the illusion of 3D. It’s done statically, and motion is added afterward.

-TGWNN

Author
Time

I’m currently working on re-doing the censored officer squib shots… I can’t use the ones in DevEd because it has so much added fake grain.

Original:

Cleaned up:

Either way, I absolutely hate these shots lol…

-TGWNN

Author
Time
 (Edited)

That guy with no name said:

Nickshimmy said:

That guy with no name said:

New shot:
New source (19SE) re-inserted the missing falcon and adjusted the motion for a more dramatic shot.

Drive: https://drive.google.com/file/d/16CDNixUattNu7e_f3JxZWs4-hEmoWOF0/view?usp=sharing
Streamable: https://streamable.com/pvv9xw

Looks great, completely natural. Can I ask how you achieved this shot?, Was it just a case animating a still of the falcon from the frame it originally appears or was there more to it? I ask as I was trying something similar in an edit I was working on and really struggled to get a satisfactory result (even though it was small in the frame, it looked like exactly what it was, a still image being moved around and zoomed out from). Thanks.

It’s an image broken into 3-4 parts that move independently to give the illusion of parallax shift, ie, the illusion of 3D. It’s done statically, and motion is added afterward.

That’s really cool and nicely done. I don’t suppose you’d care to break it down in a video? 😄

EDIT: Obviously, no pressure. I just like to see that sort of thing.

SSWR’s YouTube channel

Attack of the Clones: Alternate Timeline Edit Thread:
https://originaltrilogy.com/topic/SSWRs-Attack-of-the-Clones-Alternate-Timeline-Edit/id/66888

Author
Time

G&G-Fan said:

That guy with no name said:

Either way, I absolutely hate these shots lol…

Why

Because there are some of the dirtiest on the print, I don’t hate the actual shots, I think they look great; that’s why I’m restoring them…

Here’s the finished shot; I haven’t used a single pixel of the Blu-ray or any other source, just 4K77, and 4K78 to remove dirt on the officer’s face where the dustbuster couldn’t work… When brightened up, the image had thousands of scratches and dirt, and other stuff which had to be removed manually… I also kept the original grain layer, unlike V1, where I DNR’ed it to smithereens, did a horrible patch job using still frames from the Blu-ray, etc, and then added a fake grain layer over everything…

Streamable: https://streamable.com/orbghv

There shouldn’t be a single dust particle left in it now:

-TGWNN

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Man your edit is gonna be so useful for my own

Star Wars, Paleontology, Superhero, Godzilla fan. Darth Vader stan. 22. ADHD. College Student majoring in English Education.
My Star Wars Fan-Edits