- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
Nice job!
- Time
- Post link
Actually, it was added for the 2004 release.
Hello!
Star Wars: A New Hope DEVASTATOR EDITION (V.2 a WIP) — Page 28
- Time
- Post link
Newly redone shot fr 2.0 using partial new source:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bFl6e7aaM77sHa5ARXcxFuwECVUMiHM-/view?usp=sharing
Streamable: https://streamable.com/pw11se
Removed jumpcut and fixed misplaced laser bolts.
-TGWNN
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
New shot:
New source (19SE) re-inserted the missing falcon and adjusted the motion for a more dramatic shot.
Drive: https://drive.google.com/file/d/16CDNixUattNu7e_f3JxZWs4-hEmoWOF0/view?usp=sharing
Streamable: https://streamable.com/pvv9xw
-TGWNN
- Time
- Post link
Love it!
Attack of the Clones: Alternate Timeline Edit Thread:
https://originaltrilogy.com/topic/SSWRs-Attack-of-the-Clones-Alternate-Timeline-Edit/id/66888
- Time
- Post link
Looks pretty good!!
- Time
- Post link
Sometimes I’m just at a loss of how y’all are able to do this kind of stuff. It feels like you just spawn things out of the aether sometimes. I’m stunned.
Star Wars, Paleontology, Superhero, Godzilla fan. Darth Vader stan. 22. ADHD. College Student majoring in English Education.
My Star Wars Fan-Edits
- Time
- Post link
Just to be sure?
The blue tint was added for the 1997 Special Edition.
The walls are actually a brownish-red.
The walls being brownish red don’t help the fact that they are in a sickly trash compacter with vermin.
It’s probably a bit extreme or overdone the cyan or turquoise but it’s not showing up the nasty crap on the walls because green in the mids is so muted. Red Highlights remain solid. Also to Mention very bad black crush on some versions.
Just look at Chewie’s Fur in the stills posted. Much better in the 97 version. Problem with green.
- Time
- Post link
Looks good!
Ol’ George has the GOUT, I see.
- Time
- Post link
New shot:
New source (19SE) re-inserted the missing falcon and adjusted the motion for a more dramatic shot.
Drive: https://drive.google.com/file/d/16CDNixUattNu7e_f3JxZWs4-hEmoWOF0/view?usp=sharing
Streamable: https://streamable.com/pvv9xw
Looks great, completely natural. Can I ask how you achieved this shot?, Was it just a case animating a still of the falcon from the frame it originally appears or was there more to it? I ask as I was trying something similar in an edit I was working on and really struggled to get a satisfactory result (even though it was small in the frame, it looked like exactly what it was, a still image being moved around and zoomed out from). Thanks.
- Time
- Post link
New shot:
New source (19SE) re-inserted the missing falcon and adjusted the motion for a more dramatic shot.
Drive: https://drive.google.com/file/d/16CDNixUattNu7e_f3JxZWs4-hEmoWOF0/view?usp=sharing
Streamable: https://streamable.com/pvv9xwLooks great, completely natural. Can I ask how you achieved this shot?, Was it just a case animating a still of the falcon from the frame it originally appears or was there more to it? I ask as I was trying something similar in an edit I was working on and really struggled to get a satisfactory result (even though it was small in the frame, it looked like exactly what it was, a still image being moved around and zoomed out from). Thanks.
It’s an image broken into 3-4 parts that move independently to give the illusion of parallax shift, ie, the illusion of 3D. It’s done statically, and motion is added afterward.
-TGWNN