logo Sign In

How old Anakin and Obi Wan were originally supposed to be?

Author
Time

How old Anakin and Obi Wan were originally supposed to be? Always thought they were meant to be at least a decade older then they were in the PT

Author
Time
 (Edited)

In A Guide to the Star Wars Universe, Second Edition, Ben and Anakin’s birth years are given as 60 BBY and 55 BBY, respectively. That would’ve made them twenty-five and twenty in 35 BBY, the year given as the end date for the Clone Wars. Though who can say what Lucas had in mind in 1977. Ben may’ve been in his nineties or even older, given some of the dialogue.

Gods for some, miniature libertarian socialist flags for others.

Author
Time

That was an early guide before everything was locked down and before more movies being made. Nothing in the movies mentioned exact ages by that point. Alec Guinness turned 62 while filming in 1976. And I don’t really agree he was made to look old, other than the fact he grew a beard. His hair was already gray/white and in interviews from 1976 out of costume he was balding and looked as old, or older. Ewan McGregor today is just ten years younger than Alec was when he filmed it in 1976.

Author
Time

I guess Anakin was originally supposed to be much closer in age to Obi-Wan (maybe in his late 50s or early 60s instead of just 45 years) when the original trilogy was made. Otherwise, Lucas probably wouldn’t have casted Sebastian Shaw as dying Vader in ROTJ.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

There were conflicting ways with which Lucas tried to reconcile making Anakin and Vader the same person (I don’t say this in a negative way; I think is the best creative decision in all of Star Wars, personally).
In Ben’s monologue to Luke in SW77/ANH, he describes Anakin as if he’s a peer, and Vader as “a young Jedi” and his pupil.

I think the idea is that, when the characters were combined for ESB and ROTJ, it was retconned so that Vader and Ben were closer in age. As said in ROTJ, Anakin was still his student, but they became peers after Anakin became a knight.
I think there’s a slightly noticeable shift in Vader’s portrayal between ANH and ESB in making him appear more “mature”. He’s more stoic, his voice is deeper, and he moves in a more deliberate fashion. I think that’s a result of Vader, behind the scenes, going from being just Ben’s former pupil, separated by decades in age, to his former friend, around the same age, as well as being a father. This is solidified by Anakin’s unmasked self and Force ghost in 1983 being a similar age to Ben.

When it came time for the Prequels, it seemed that Lucas changed his mind and went back to the idea that Anakin/Vader is noticeably younger then Obi-Wan, leaning more towards his description as a young Jedi. The Prequels establish that he was only 22 upon turning to the dark side, when Obi-Wan was 38. This is what led to the Force ghost change. I’m sure Lucas handwaves his rough appearance when unmasked to being roasted by lava (I prefer the idea of dark side physical corruption).

I think a middle ground is better. Anakin should’ve been more in his late twenties when turning, with Vader being in his 50s in the OT. 22 is just too young. But I don’t think Vader should be like, in his 70s in the OT either.

Star Wars, Paleontology, Superhero, Godzilla fan. Darth Vader stan. 22. ADHD. College Student majoring in English Education.
My Star Wars Fan-Edits