logo Sign In

HAHAHAHA now GL has no excuse for.....

Author
Date
Author
Time
Post link
HAHAHAHAHAHA now Geogre Lucas has absolutely no excuise for the CGI looking like crap in the OT in his next 'version' of the OT. Because photorealistic CGI in now in use. The first movie that they use lots of it in is The Chronicles Of Narnia and it comes out tomorrow but i've been watching alot of clips and it looks great. This new form of CGI is so much more believable than the SE shit. Sorry Just had to share.
Author
Time
Post link
Yay! That'll cause him to go back and "fix" even more! Oh, wait...

But, I can't wait to see The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe (which I still feel should be the name of the movie)!

There is no lingerie in space…

C3PX said: Gaffer is like that hot girl in high school that you think you have a chance with even though she is way out of your league because she is sweet and not a stuck up bitch who pretends you don’t exist… then one day you spot her making out with some skinny twerp, only on second glance you realize it is the goth girl who always sits in the back of class; at that moment it dawns on you why she is never seen hanging off the arm of any of the jocks… and you realize, damn, she really is unobtainable after all. Not that that is going to stop you from dreaming… Only in this case, Gaffer is actually a guy.

Author
Time
Post link
yay but all the shit in the SE's looks so bad and unbeleivable, at least he can make it beviable. Plus i can't wait to see the lion the witch and the wardore i love that book and the movie looks awesome!!!!
Author
Time
Post link
Originally posted by: Kaal-Jhyy
Hum... the SE is 8 year old...


ya but he had the chance to make it more believable in 2004 but whatever he's hiding the good looking ones till 2007
Author
Time
Post link
Just out of curiosity, what makes some CGI photorealistic and other not photorealistic? What does a photorealistic Hutt look like? How does a photorealistic dewback move?
"It's the stoned movie you don't have to be stoned for." -- Tom Shales on Star Wars
Scruffy's gonna die the way he lived.
Author
Time
Post link
hmm how do i put it into words.... well yes they do move and they look at hell of alot more real, not so plastic fake looking
Author
Time
Post link
I heard that the CG quality of Narnia is inconsistent at best. Apparently it is full of really good scenes followed by really awful scenes...you guys will probably end up seeing it before it comes out here, though, so let me know how it goes.
MTFBWY. Always.

http://www.myspace.com/red_ajax
Author
Time
Post link
Even on the commercials, though, you can tell that a lot of the CG still looks kinda cartoony. It doesn't look any better than the plastic dewbacks.
Author
Time
Post link
i think cg just looks phony, the only movie that still looks good using something organic is probably still jurassic park for me. even better than lost world. cg seems to look more realistic on film than on digital video, maybe thats just me though.

still other filmmakers know how to play up its strengths, like peter jackson for instance. although ive liked harry potters effects too
Author
Time
Post link
Some CG is done poorly, it looks like it was half finished and incomplete. I hated the dewbacks in the SE. I'm glad King Kong will beat ROTS for money this year
"Yub Knub" by Warrick Davis
Author
Time
Post link
Originally posted by: kev
I'm glad King Kong will beat ROTS for money this year


It doesn't look like it so far. They say it had a less than satisfactory opening weekend.