Hello everyone. This is my first post. I have read these OT forums for about 15 years and appreciate everyone’s contributions to OT appreciation and preservation. I had a question that I am dying to ask people here. I was watching the Kenobi show, and even though it is Definitely flawed, I felt that it was at least better made than the prequels trilogy. I wanted to know what this community feels about this comparison. Which one do you feel is the better prequel? Since I have major issues with the prequel trilogy (movies suck, books II and III were way better) I felt that the Kenobi show was at least better made, and didn’t make Vader look A fool like he did in revenge of the Sith nor did he look like an overly obsessive weirdo like he did in attack of the clones. I feel if we watched the Kenobi show and ignore the prequels, it gives just a little bit of hints as to what happened to Anakin while still leaving it a mystery And not ruining the Darth Vader character, which is the biggest issue of the prequels in my opinion. There are a little bit of flashbacks, but all we really see is Anakin burning and small connections to the PT like seeing Qui Gong but if you never seen the prequel, it really doesn’t hurt your understanding of what’s going on. Does anyone here think Kenobi is a better prequel than the actual prequel trilogy? I definitely can see where people don’t like either because they definitely both have errors in their writing but if you had to choose, which one would it would be?