BedeHistory731 said:
I mean, it’s kinda clear that their best material comes when they’re dunking on schlock and bizarre videos. Not comic book movies or Star Wars/Star Trek. Besides, Mike and Rich do re:View videos on that stuff often and realized that the modern stuff isn’t really for them. So they stopped watching, like any sane person would.
Also, Jay is very much there and present when they talk about the schlock. He’s there when they talk about ‘80s action and horror trash, surreal tapes, and random delusions of grandeur. Was he magically gone when they talked about Actar 911 Infantry or Creating Rem Lezar?
Jay doesn’t really seem to put too much mind into his Twitter, so I don’t know where you’re getting that from. They’re not “afraid of being cancelled” so much as they’re older and lost some of that righteous passion from the Plinkett days. Maybe that’s the legacy of Space Cop draining them of their filmmaking urges, IDK.
Modern RLM is way more enjoyable to me than the classic Plinkett stuff. Especially when Jack, Josh, or Colin are there.
Watching some of their older videos occasionally causes “cultural whiplash”, as the viewer is rapidly transported back to a time when a joke about an old man ejaculating uncontrollably while watching an Olsen twins movie was something that could actually happen on YouTube without concerns about demonetization or audience backlash. But I agree RLM is better in their more mature, modern form on average.
I think they mostly phased out Plinkett reviews because the joke can’t really be taken any further, and doesn’t really even make sense in the context of 2024. The Plinkett character was a stereotypical, basement-dwelling, sci-fi nerd amalgamated for the sake of an absurdist exaggeration with the adjacent trope of the basement-dwelling psychopath from Silence of the Lambs. But for the Plinkett character to work as a vehicle for critiquing science fiction movies, there needs to be an overall social context where obsessive, reclusive nerdiness is socially unacceptable. In the 2020s this is no longer the case, and tons of people make five-hour obsessive nitpicky videos complaining about sci-fi/fantasy series. Back in 2009 when RLM’s Phantom Menace review debuted, the average YouTube video was under 10 minutes, and making a 90 minute video criticizing a Star Wars movie was the kind of thing that would get you labeled as a social outcast by the mainstream. The Plinkett character effectively served as a satirical meta-joke “lampshading” the very fact that Mike Stoklasa wanted to make 90 minute videos obsessing about Star Wars. But in the 2020s, making 90 minute videos obsessing about nerdy movies is just a good business model for many YouTubers. Thus, the entire premise of Plinkett as an absurdist exaggeration of a basement dwelling, pizza-roll eating nerd with bad hygiene who makes lengthy videos obsessing about sci-fi minutiae is now obsolete. Plinkett used to be a reference to and satire of a specific cultural trope, but is now arguably just a “floating signifier”.