Originally posted by: MeBeJedi
"2001 did it. I supopse Kubrick failed?"

LOL...now you clump these two films together to make your point? Nice try.

I'm sorry you didn't get 2001, but don't blame that failing on Kubrick.

No one truly "gets" 2001, since in a film, people come away with their own ideas. Everyone merely "gets" their own interpretation. Hell, even Clarke's book is an interpretation, except it is directly from the creator of the story and it lays out everything out for ya'. And, as you should have noticed, I was making a comparison. What the fuck is wrong with that? I praise Kubrick for making nearly every element of 2001 ambiguous. That is the sign of a master filmmaker. I posed my libne about Kubrick as a question to you, of how you feel about him, not as a statement of my own personal feelings. What on earth gave you the idea that I have anything against Kubrick? I think you were a little too quick to jump to conclusions there, buddy.