Originally posted by: sybeman
Now, let me get this straight. Gaffer says two different things -- contradicting things, at that (that there should be an epilogue scene ending the war, and that the war goes on for years afterwards) and Adam agrees with both. Why not contradict the first point the first time?
This goes back to "the fool or the fool who follows..." except that I don't think Gaffer a fool.
Now, let me get this straight. Gaffer says two different things -- contradicting things, at that (that there should be an epilogue scene ending the war, and that the war goes on for years afterwards) and Adam agrees with both. Why not contradict the first point the first time?
This goes back to "the fool or the fool who follows..." except that I don't think Gaffer a fool.
Well, thank you for not thinking me a fool. Perhaps I didn't make myself clear. I used to word epilogue to imply that this scene would take place far down the road, when the war actually did end. Maybe some montage of post-Death Star battles, etc. Or maybe stills from said battles with a narrational piece. But it might end up too convoluted and confusing, especially since George's style never allows for the unrealistic passage of time, like montages.
**USUAL DISCLAIMER** Not supporting change, just throwing out an idea. You know the drill. Kinda like fanfiction.